XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism
XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion, us.issues.abortion
From: ladyhawk_twonospam@hotmail.com
Robert B. Winn wrote:
> "junegill" wrote in message news:...
>
>>"Robert B. Winn" wrote in message
>>news:7943568.0404010601.476618d9@posting.google.com...
>>
>>>"junegill" wrote in message news:>
>>[snip]
>>
>>
>>>>>>>I have not cast any stones, whatsoever. Jesus Christ was without
>>>>>>>sin. What he said to the woman taken in adultery was, Go, and sin
>>
>> no
>>
>>>>>>>more. I said the same thing to Mark Seebree. Mark Seebree said
>>
>> that
>>
>>>>>>>I was being hateful and oppressive to women.
>>>>>>>Robert B. Winn
>>>>>>>Robert B. Winn
>>>>>>
>>>>>>You most certainly have cast stones: you've accused Mark of
>>
>> adultery,
>>
>>>>>>homicide and terrorism. I asked whether _you_ are without sin, not
>>
>> Jesus
>>
>>>>>>Christ. Note that He didn't cast the first, or any, stone at the
>>
>> woman.
>> If
>>
>>>>>>you think that you have the same authority as Jesus to say what He
>>
>> said,
>>
>>>>>>then you have delusions of grandeur. Mark is quite right that you
>>
>> are
>>
>>>>>>hateful and oppressive to women: you seem to think you have the
>>
>> right to
>>
>>>>>>dictate to women what they should do with their own bodies and would
>>
>> take
>>
>>>>>>their bodily autonomy away from them - doesn't get much more hateful
>>
>> and
>>
>>>>>>oppressive than that.
>>>>>
>>>>>Mark Seebree was the one who wrote a long dissertation about his
>>>>>adulteries. All that took place up until that time was that I pointed
>>>>>out that prophecy says that anyone who denies the existence of God and
>>>>>demands to see a sign is an adulterer, which Mark immediately
>>>>>confirmed to be true in his case. So I tell him, Go and commit
>>>>>adultery no more, and you claim I have been hateful and oppressive.
>>>>
>>>>That's where your delusions of grandeur come in - telling Mark what to
>>
>> do as
>>
>>>>though you're Jesus Christ. You are full of pride (the worst sin), if
>>
>> you
>>
>>>>think you have the same authority as your Deity.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>It appears to me that any criticism of adultery is what you consider
>>>>>to be hateful.
>>>>>Robert B. Winn
>>>>
>>>>No, I do not consider criticism of adultery to be hateful - it's not
>>
>> anyone
>>
>>>>else's business, but not hateful. Of course, that's real adultery I'm
>>>>talking about, as in cheating on one's spouse. What is hateful, as I
>>
>> said
>>
>>>>up above, is that you'd take away women's bodily autonomy if you could.
>>>
>>>I do not get involved in adultery.
>>>Robert B. winn
>>
>>Where did I say that you do? You've completely ignored everything that I
>>posted and come up with something totally irrelevant. It's about time
>>someone reported you to your ISP for adding irrelevant one-liners to lengthy
>>posts.
>
>
> Well, here is what you might want to report.
>
> child n. 1. an unborn or recently born person
> Meririam-Webster dictionary
>
> As I understand it, there is nothing considered to be a greater
> offense in a pro-abortion society than using this definition of child.
> Robert B. Winn
I'd get just as offended by you using a wrong definition of anything
else. So is a three month old infant an adult? You haven't answered yet
and its a pretty simple question...
--
--sexkitten--"There was a time when religion ruled the
world. It was known as The Dark Ages."
[Ruth Hurmence Green]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
