XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism
XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion, us.issues.abortion
From: fnordy2k@yahoo.com
In article <7943568.0404031949.21b895fa@posting.google.com>, Robert B.
Winn wrote:
> --sexkitten-- wrote in message
> news:...
> > Robert B. Winn wrote:
> > > --sexkitten-- wrote in message
> > > news:...
> > >
> > >>Robert B. Winn wrote:
> > >>
> > >>>--sexkitten-- wrote in message
> > >>>news:...
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>>Robert B. Winn wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>>--sexkitten-- wrote in message
> > >>>>>news:...
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>Robert B. Winn wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>--sexkitten-- wrote in message
> > >>>>>>>news:...
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>--sexkitten-- wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>Robert B. Winn wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>"junegill" wrote in message
> > >>>>>>>>>>news:...
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>"Robert B. Winn" wrote in message
> > >>>>>>>>>>>news:7943568.0403290933.3ff2f30c@posting.google.com...
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>"junegill" wrote in message
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>news:...
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>[piggybacking]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>"--sexkitten--" wrote in
> message
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>news:c453om$2e0gf5$2@ID-163025.news.uni-berlin.de...
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Robert B. Winn wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>[snip]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Well, what about the opinion of Merriam-Webster
> dictionary?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>child n. 1. an unborn or recently born person
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Robert b. Winn
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Thus making your average infant an adult.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Only to pro-abortion people. Normal people can tell what
> a child
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>is.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Robert B. Winn
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Yes, they can. A person between birth and puberty, like the
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>dictionaries
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>say.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>child n. 1. an unborn or recently born person
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Merriam-Webster dictionary.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Robert B. Winn
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>What's the Merriam-Webster dictionary definition of
> 'adulterer'?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>I don't know. Probably something Mark Seebree would like. The
> only
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>definition of adulterer I use is the one Jesus Christ gave.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>Robert B. Winn
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>So Merriam-Webster definitions are OK when they say what you
> want
> > >>>>>>>>>>>them to
> > >>>>>>>>>>>say, but to be ignored when they don't, right? Did Jesus ever
> define
> > >>>>>>>>>>>'child' as being unborn?
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>Lots of times. Read the first verses of Jeremiah chapter 1.
> > >>>>>>>>>>Robert B. Winn
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>Jesus did not write Jeremiah. The only direct quotes attributed to
> > >>>>>>>>>Jesus
> > >>>>>>>>>were in the first 4 books of the OT (and one I think in Acts).
> > >>>>>>>>>Besides,
> > >>>>>>>>>you claimed the OT was no longer valid, so it's definitions no
> > >>>>>>>>>longer
> > >>>>>>>>>apply. Please provide a quote from the first 4 books of the NT.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>Being that I'm speaking to you, I'd better make that clearer.
> > >>>>>>>>Please
> > >>>>>>>>provide a quote from the first 4 books of the NT *specifically
> > >>>>>>>>attributed to Jesus*, in other words, something that he said
> > >>>>>>>>defining child.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>Matthew 18:14 Even so it is not the will of your Father which is in
> > >>>>>>>Heaven, that one of these little ones should perish.
> > >>>>>>>Robert B. Winn
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>I don't see the word abortion in there, and anyhow how is it possible
> > >>>>>>to
> > >>>>>>go against the will of god? Isn't he all knowing and all powerful?
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>Well, if you think satan is doing the will of God, then you are
> > >>>>>probably going to follow satan.
> > >>>>>Robert B. winn
> > >>>>
> > >>>>...how is it possible to go against the will of god? Isn't he all
> > >>>>knowing and all powerful?
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>Well, for instance, God said, Thou shalt not kill.
> > >>
> > >>No, he didn't. In fact he said "Kill" a lot.
> > >>
> > >> But today the
> > >>
> > >>>majority of people see nothing wrong with killing an unborn child.
> > >>>God knows the children were killed.
> > >>
> > >>...how is it possible to go against the will of god? Isn't he all
> > >>knowing and all powerful?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>Robert B. winn
> > >
> > >
> > > Well, for instance, killing unborn children goes against the will of God.
> > > Robert B. Winn
> >
> > But killing born infants isn't... he was very specific about that... so
> > what you are saying is that we should kill them AFTER birth instead?
>
> You should not kill them at all.
You'll have to take that up with god, since he says differently.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
