XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism
XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion, us.issues.abortion
From: junegill@btinternet.com
"Robert B. Winn" wrote in message
news:7943568.0404031534.1310e3a0@posting.google.com...
> "junegill" wrote in message
news:...
> > "Robert B. Winn" wrote in message
> > news:7943568.0404010601.476618d9@posting.google.com...
> > > "junegill" wrote in message news: >
> > [snip]
> >
> > > > > > > I have not cast any stones, whatsoever. Jesus Christ was
without
> > > > > > > sin. What he said to the woman taken in adultery was, Go, and
sin
> > no
> > > > > > > more. I said the same thing to Mark Seebree. Mark Seebree
said
> > that
> > > > > > > I was being hateful and oppressive to women.
> > > > > > > Robert B. Winn
> > > > > > > Robert B. Winn
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You most certainly have cast stones: you've accused Mark of
> > adultery,
> > > > > > homicide and terrorism. I asked whether _you_ are without sin,
not
> > Jesus
> > > > > > Christ. Note that He didn't cast the first, or any, stone at
the
> > woman.
> > If
> > > > > > you think that you have the same authority as Jesus to say what
He
> > said,
> > > > > > then you have delusions of grandeur. Mark is quite right that
you
> > are
> > > > > > hateful and oppressive to women: you seem to think you have the
> > right to
> > > > > > dictate to women what they should do with their own bodies and
would
> > take
> > > > > > their bodily autonomy away from them - doesn't get much more
hateful
> > and
> > > > > > oppressive than that.
> > > > >
> > > > > Mark Seebree was the one who wrote a long dissertation about his
> > > > > adulteries. All that took place up until that time was that I
pointed
> > > > > out that prophecy says that anyone who denies the existence of God
and
> > > > > demands to see a sign is an adulterer, which Mark immediately
> > > > > confirmed to be true in his case. So I tell him, Go and commit
> > > > > adultery no more, and you claim I have been hateful and
oppressive.
> > > >
> > > > That's where your delusions of grandeur come in - telling Mark what
to
> > do as
> > > > though you're Jesus Christ. You are full of pride (the worst sin),
if
> > you
> > > > think you have the same authority as your Deity.
> > > >
> > > > > It appears to me that any criticism of adultery is what you
consider
> > > > > to be hateful.
> > > > > Robert B. Winn
> > > >
> > > > No, I do not consider criticism of adultery to be hateful - it's not
> > anyone
> > > > else's business, but not hateful. Of course, that's real adultery
I'm
> > > > talking about, as in cheating on one's spouse. What is hateful, as
I
> > said
> > > > up above, is that you'd take away women's bodily autonomy if you
could.
> > >
> > > I do not get involved in adultery.
> > > Robert B. winn
> >
> > Where did I say that you do? You've completely ignored everything that
I
> > posted and come up with something totally irrelevant. It's about time
> > someone reported you to your ISP for adding irrelevant one-liners to
lengthy
> > posts.
>
> Well, here is what you might want to report.
>
> child n. 1. an unborn or recently born person
> Meririam-Webster dictionary
>
> As I understand it, there is nothing considered to be a greater
> offense in a pro-abortion society than using this definition of child.
> Robert B. Winn
No, the greatest offence to pro-choicers is the anti-abortion faction's view
that a woman's body should be used regardless of her wishes.
--
June G
# 364
http://uk.geocities.com/junegill@btopenworld.com/webpages/index.html.html
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
