XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion, us.issues.abortion   
   From: junegill@btinternet.com   
      
   "Robert B. Winn"  wrote in message   
   news:7943568.0404032152.2afa670d@posting.google.com...   
   > "junegill"  wrote in message   
   news:...   
   > > "MrD Pstychologist (retired)"  wrote in message   
   > > news:c4igak$fea$1@news.netins.net...   
   > > >   
   > > > "junegill"  wrote in message   
   > > > news:c4fsc9$4s7$1@hercules.btinternet.com...   
   > > > > "Robert B. Winn"  wrote in message   
   > > > > news:7943568.0403310758.74cc7df5@posting.google.com...   
   > >   
   > > [snip]   
   > >   
   > > > > > > You most certainly have cast stones: you've accused Mark of   
   > >  adultery,   
   > > > > > > homicide and terrorism.  I asked whether _you_ are without sin,   
   not   
   > >  Jesus   
   > > > > > > Christ.  Note that He didn't cast the first, or any, stone at   
   the   
   > >  woman.   
   > >  If   
   > > > > > > you think that you have the same authority as Jesus to say what   
   He   
   > >  said,   
   > > > > > > then you have delusions of grandeur.  Mark is quite right that   
   you   
   > >  are   
   > > > > > > hateful and oppressive to women: you seem to think you have the   
   > >  right   
   > >  to   
   > > > > > > dictate to women what they should do with their own bodies and   
   would   
   > >  take   
   > > > > > > their bodily autonomy away from them - doesn't get much more   
   hateful   
   > >  and   
   > > > > > > oppressive than that.   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > Mark Seebree was the one who wrote a long dissertation about his   
   > > > > > adulteries.  All that took place up until that time was that I   
   pointed   
   > > > > > out that prophecy says that anyone who denies the existence of God   
   and   
   > > > > > demands to see a sign is an adulterer, which Mark immediately   
   > > > > > confirmed to be true in his case.  So I tell him, Go and commit   
   > > > > > adultery no more, and you claim I have been hateful and   
   oppressive.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > That's where your delusions of grandeur come in - telling Mark what   
   to   
   > >  do   
   > >  as   
   > > > > though you're Jesus Christ.  You are full of pride (the worst sin),   
   if   
   > >  you   
   > > > > think you have the same authority as your Deity.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > > It appears to me that any criticism of adultery is what you   
   consider   
   > > > > > to be hateful.   
   > > > > > Robert B. Winn   
   > > > >   
   > > > > No, I do not consider criticism of adultery to be hateful - it's not   
   > >  anyone   
   > > > > else's business, but not hateful.  Of course, that's real adultery   
   I'm   
   > > > > talking about, as in cheating on one's spouse.  What is hateful, as   
   I   
   > >  said   
   > > > > up above, is that you'd take away women's bodily autonomy if you   
   could.   
   > > >   
   > > > Only a complete idiot would take the above paragraph and reply as if   
   > >  you've   
   > > > accused him of being involved in adultery.  I realise that Winn   
   doesn't   
   > > > understand what adultery is, but sometimes he really shows just how   
   > >  idiotic   
   > > > he is.   
   > >   
   > > Not just idiotic - he's insulting our intelligence by thinking his non   
   > > sequiturs will fool us into thinking he's answered the points made and   
   the   
   > > questions asked.  Note that he didn't like to tackle the charge of being   
   > > full of pride.   
   > >   
   > > I wouldn't worry too much about him until he begins answering the   
   > > > same posts twice, as if he's forgotten what he's avoided answering   
   already   
   > > > and makes a point of avoiding it again.   
   > >   
   > > Maybe he has Irish ancestry and did it to be sure, to be sure.  :)   
   > >   
   > > > I think that Winn really does want to control women but he can't even   
   > > > control himself. I think he is probably afraid of women and the only   
   > > > relationship he has is with his mother.   
   > >   
   > > I think you're probably right.   
   >   
   > You pro-abortion people seem to need to support one another right now.   
   >  Perhaps we could discuss abortion some more when your self esteem is   
   > better.   
   > Robert B. Winn   
      
   No, we don't need to support one another, although it's nice when someone   
   does support you - I haven't seen anyone supporting you yet, by the way.  As   
   to self-esteem - mine's so secure that I never even think about it.   
      
   --   
   June G   
   # 364   
   http://uk.geocities.com/junegill@btopenworld.com/webpages/index.html.html   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)