XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism
XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion, us.issues.abortion
From: ladyhawk_twonospam@hotmail.com
Robert B. Winn wrote:
> --sexkitten-- wrote in message
news:...
>
>>Robert B. Winn wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"junegill" wrote in message news:...
>>>
>>>
>>>>"Robert B. Winn" wrote in message
>>>>news:7943568.0404010601.476618d9@posting.google.com...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>"junegill" wrote in message news:>>>
>>>>[snip]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>I have not cast any stones, whatsoever. Jesus Christ was without
>>>>>>>>>sin. What he said to the woman taken in adultery was, Go, and sin
>>>>
>>>>no
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>more. I said the same thing to Mark Seebree. Mark Seebree said
>>>>
>>>>that
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>I was being hateful and oppressive to women.
>>>>>>>>>Robert B. Winn
>>>>>>>>>Robert B. Winn
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>You most certainly have cast stones: you've accused Mark of
>>>>
>>>>adultery,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>homicide and terrorism. I asked whether _you_ are without sin, not
>>>>
>>>>Jesus
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>Christ. Note that He didn't cast the first, or any, stone at the
>>>>
>>>>woman.
>>>>If
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>you think that you have the same authority as Jesus to say what He
>>>>
>>>>said,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>then you have delusions of grandeur. Mark is quite right that you
>>>>
>>>>are
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>hateful and oppressive to women: you seem to think you have the
>>>>
>>>>right to
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>dictate to women what they should do with their own bodies and would
>>>>
>>>>take
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>their bodily autonomy away from them - doesn't get much more hateful
>>>>
>>>>and
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>oppressive than that.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Mark Seebree was the one who wrote a long dissertation about his
>>>>>>>adulteries. All that took place up until that time was that I pointed
>>>>>>>out that prophecy says that anyone who denies the existence of God and
>>>>>>>demands to see a sign is an adulterer, which Mark immediately
>>>>>>>confirmed to be true in his case. So I tell him, Go and commit
>>>>>>>adultery no more, and you claim I have been hateful and oppressive.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>That's where your delusions of grandeur come in - telling Mark what to
>>>>
>>>>do as
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>though you're Jesus Christ. You are full of pride (the worst sin), if
>>>>
>>>>you
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>think you have the same authority as your Deity.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>It appears to me that any criticism of adultery is what you consider
>>>>>>>to be hateful.
>>>>>>>Robert B. Winn
>>>>>>
>>>>>>No, I do not consider criticism of adultery to be hateful - it's not
>>>>
>>>>anyone
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>else's business, but not hateful. Of course, that's real adultery I'm
>>>>>>talking about, as in cheating on one's spouse. What is hateful, as I
>>>>
>>>>said
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>up above, is that you'd take away women's bodily autonomy if you could.
>>>>>
>>>>>I do not get involved in adultery.
>>>>>Robert B. winn
>>>>
>>>>Where did I say that you do? You've completely ignored everything that I
>>>>posted and come up with something totally irrelevant. It's about time
>>>>someone reported you to your ISP for adding irrelevant one-liners to
lengthy
>>>>posts.
>>>
>>>
>>>Well, here is what you might want to report.
>>>
>>> child n. 1. an unborn or recently born person
>>> Meririam-Webster dictionary
>>>
>>>As I understand it, there is nothing considered to be a greater
>>>offense in a pro-abortion society than using this definition of child.
>>>Robert B. Winn
>>
>>I'd get just as offended by you using a wrong definition of anything
>>else. So is a three month old infant an adult? You haven't answered yet
>>and its a pretty simple question...
>
>
> Why don't you decide whether or not you want a three month old infant
> to be an adult.
Why are you putting it on me? YOU defined it as an adult.
--
--sexkitten--"There was a time when religion ruled the
world. It was known as The Dark Ages."
[Ruth Hurmence Green]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
