XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion, us.issues.abortion   
   From: fnordy2k@yahoo.com   
      
   In article <7943568.0404041654.78b17374@posting.google.com>, Robert B.   
   Winn  wrote:   
      
   > William Klee  wrote in message   
   > news:<010420040216182857%fnordy2k@yahoo.com>...   
   > > In article <7943568.0403312045.3e655e1@posting.google.com>, Robert B.   
   > > Winn  wrote:   
   > >   
   > > > William Klee  wrote in message   
   > > > news:<300320041536159524%fnordy2k@yahoo.com>...   
   > > > > In article <7943568.0403301059.6c4738b6@posting.google.com>, Robert B.   
   > > > > Winn  wrote:   
   > > > >   
   > > > > > William Klee  wrote in message   
   > > > > > news:<290320042240170096%fnordy2k@yahoo.com>...   
   > > > > > > In article <7943568.0403291913.17cb02fe@posting.google.com>, Robert   
   > > > > > > B.   
   > > > > > > Winn  wrote:   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > --sexkitten--  wrote in message   
   > > > > > > > news:...   
   > > > > > > > > Robert B. Winn wrote:   
   > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > --sexkitten--  wrote in   
   > message   
   > > > > > > > > > news:...   
   > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > >>Robert B. Winn wrote:   
   > > > > > > > > >>   
   > > > > > > > > >>   
   > > > > > > > > >>>--sexkitten--  wrote in   
   > message   
   > > > > > > > > >>>news:...   
   > > > > > > > > >>>   
   > > > > > > > > >>>   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>Robert B. Winn wrote:   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>--sexkitten--  wrote in   
   > message   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>news:...   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>Robert B. Winn wrote:   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>No, our present discussion was about the term "child",   
   > which   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>according   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>to you means that children become adults at age two   
   > months.   
   > >  YOU   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>brought   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>up stages of development. You really need to have that   
   > ADHD   
   > >  treated.   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>Well, the ones who are not killed before being born have   
   > a   
   > >  fairly   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>good   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>chance of survival.  People who delight in killing   
   > children   
   > >  are   
   > >  not   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>yet brave enough to kill the ones that were born except   
   > in   
   > >  rare   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>cases.   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>Robert B. Winn   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>I don't recall that he's killed either actual children or   
   > your   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>imaginary   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>ones.   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>People involved in homicides often claim to be unable to   
   > >  remember.   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>Robert B. Winn   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>Like you? You can't seem to remember what you want to talk   
   > to   
   > >  the   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>police   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>about.   
   > > > > > > > > >>>   
   > > > > > > > > >>>   
   > > > > > > > > >>>I do not want to talk to the police.  Mark Seebree is the   
   > one who   
   > > > > > > > > >>>wants to talk to the police.   
   > > > > > > > > >>>Robert B. Winn   
   > > > > > > > > >>   
   > > > > > > > > >>No, he doesn't, he wants YOU to since YOU accused him of   
   > crimes.   
   > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > Well, maybe he would like to report that violation of   
   > pro-abortion   
   > > > > > > > > > rules to the police.   
   > > > > > > > > > Robert B. Winn   
   > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > Nope. He wants YOU to talk to the police, which you obviously   
   > have   
   > > > > > > > > a   
   > > > > > > > > desperate need to do. Something on your conscience, Robert?   
   > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > Well, I know Mark is a little backward about making the first   
   > > > > > > > contact.   
   > > > > > > >  I really do feel bad that I cannot help him more.  Thank you for   
   > > > > > > > bringing that to my attention.  I should be more compassionate.   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > More compassionate? You're going to stop lying? I'll believe that   
   > > > > > > when   
   > > > > > > I see it.   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > Thank you for sharing, William.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > S++   
   > > > >   
   > > > > Do you plan to stop lying at any point in the foreseeable future?   
   > > >   
   > > > I don't plan to start lying.   
   > >   
   > > There's another lie right there; N++   
   >   
   > Well, it is hard to see why N++ would be a lie, but you would know   
   > better than anyone else.   
      
   Forgot already? Maybe I should put it in my sig, so you don't forget.   
      
   N is a variable that stands for the number of your lies. The starting   
   value is (total number of your posts) * 0.9, since about 90% of your   
   posts contain at least one lie. N++ is a shorthand notation for   
   "increment the value of N by one".   
      
   Of course, I could make it even easier:   
      
   if(posterID.equals("Robert B. Winn")){   
         N++;   
         S++;   
   } // end if   
      
   And since you've probably forgotten this as well, S is the variable for   
   your non-sequitors, with a starting value of (total number of your   
   posts) * 0.75, since you lie about fifteen percent more often than you   
   spout non-sequitors.   
      
   Don't worry about remembering all this hard stuff; I'll be putting it   
   into my sig.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)