XPost: alt.abortion, alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion   
   XPost: alt.abortion.repent, alt.discuss.life, alt.politics.abortion   
   XPost: alt.religion.jehovahs-witn, us.issues.abortion   
   From: noneedtoknow@mail.com   
      
   "Light Templar"  wrote in message   
   news:3BFdc.3668$A_4.203@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...   
   > Osprey wrote:   
   > > "Light Templar"  wrote in message   
   > > news:m6Fdc.3614$A_4.2665@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...   
   > >> Jabriol wrote:   
   > >>> On  8-Apr-2004, "Light Templar"  wrote:   
   > >>>   
   > >>>>>> A pre-born child?  No, it's called a fetus and yes, I support a   
   > >>>>>> woman's right   
   > >>>>>> to choose regardless of how she became pregnant.  Her body, her   
   > >>>>>> choice.   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> killing a fetus is against the law..   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> But abortion is not.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> and the difference is?   
   > >>>   
   > >>   
   > >> Abortion is not covered under the new law.   
   > >>   
   > >>>   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>>> Feti in the uterus have the potential to become human beings   
   > >>>>>> should they be   
   > >>>>>> carried to term.  They are not considered human beings while in   
   > >>>>>> the uterus.   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> says who?   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> Current law   
   > >>>   
   > >>> wrong.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> Bush signed into law the "violence against Fetus act"   
   > >>   
   > >> Have you actually bothered to read the act?    The death or harm of   
   > >> the fetus becomes a crime IF and ONLY IF said death or harm came as   
   > >> a result of an act of violence perpetrated against the mother, ergo,   
   > >> abortion does not meet that criteria.   
   > >   
   > >   
   > > Why not?   
   > >   
   >   
   > Because under the law, abortion is not an act of violence where the mother   
   > consents to it.   
   >   
   > End of debate.   
      
   No, sorry but it can't be the end of the debate.  Especially if there are   
   questions that   
   are particularly difficult to address, such as the ones I am going to ask.   
      
   So, if a mother consents to the death of the unborn that is o.k..   
   But if she doesn't consent, suddenly the unborn has rights as we do after   
   birth.   
      
   Why is that?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)