XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion   
   From: nachobiznez@all.com   
      
   "Robert B. Winn" wrote in message   
   news:7943568.0405091212.3167ae43@posting.google.com...   
   > "MrD" wrote in message   
   news:...   
   > > "Robert B. Winn" wrote in message   
   > > news:7943568.0405080419.78be4081@posting.google.com...   
   > > > "MrD" wrote in message   
   > > news:...   
   > > > > "Robert B. Winn" wrote in message   
   > > > > news:7943568.0405071602.74906090@posting   
   > > > > > > tunnel in the bible calls for did not mean that the tunnel was   
   cut   
   > > before   
   > > > > > > the biblical writer thought it a good idea to give one of his   
   heros   
   > > credit   
   > > > > > > for it. In other words, you do not want to discuss the myth or   
   the   
   > > facts,   
   > > > > > > you want to blindly believe that which is unsupported in fact   
   and   
   > > libel   
   > > > > > > other people.   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > Well, if you want to believe that Hezekiah did not have a tunnel   
   > > > > > built, you are free to believe that. There will be water in the   
   Pool   
   > > > > > of Siloam no matter what you believe.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > There will be water in the pool of siloam no matter who had the   
   tunnel   
   > > dug   
   > > > > as well.   
   > > > > I guess that point escaped you while your brain was playing   
   > > hide-and-seek   
   > > > > behind one of your nose hairs.   
   > > >   
   > > > There was water in the pool of Siloam at the time of Christ. How do   
   > > > you account for that?   
   > >   
   > > Quite easily and obviously. The tunnel was dug by someone before   
   Hezekiah's   
   > > attempt to take credit for it. It was probably dug by someone willing   
   to   
   > > work rather than spend their time on their knees worshipping a   
   baby-killing   
   > > deity like you do.   
   >   
   > Well, it seems a little more believable to me that the tunnel was dug   
   > for military reason as Isaiah and the writers of 2 Kings and 2   
   > Chronicles stated rather than being dug at an earlier time so that   
   > pro-abortion people of the last days would have something they could   
   > say that was true.   
      
   Perhaps it was dug generations earlier for military purposes and Hezekiah   
   was just given the credit. It certainly wasn't dug to give anyone   
   something they could say was true. That's the dumbest theory I've heard you   
   come up with lately. Why do you think the tunnel was dug, so that you could   
   be correct now?   
   There is no proof that Hezekiah ordered it other than what is recorded in   
   the bible.   
   There is plenty of question about what is recorded in the bible, it is   
   commonly found to be totally inaccurate and written well after the matter by   
   third hand sources. It's useless for anything beyond entertainment.   
   But, of course, you wouldn't know that. You haven't even read it well   
   enough to know that Jesus had sisters.   
   What else don't you know about Jesus? You would have no way of knowing,   
   would you? Oh, I forgot, you just make things up and then say God said it.   
   Blasphemy is your way of dealing with your lack of education and your lack   
   of honesty. Jesus will not look upon you, you curse the light.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|