XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism
XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion
From: prochoice@here.now
On Mon, 10 May 2004 22:49:16 GMT, "Light Templar"
in alt.abortion with message-id
wrote:
>In news:1pvv90lsrbf6rmesotlfc5r7plhrvfftpb@4ax.com,
>Attila gave us all a good laugh with the following...
>
>> On 10 May 2004 07:01:30 -0700, rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B.
>> Winn) in alt.abortion with message-id
>> <7943568.0405100601.759170a1@posting.google.com> wrote:
>>
>>> "Light Templar" >>>>>> Hezekiah's
>>>>>>> tunnel was built as a conduit for water.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Prove it.
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't need to.
>>>>
>>>> You do if you wish to be taken seriously.
>>>>
>>>>> The water running through the tunnel proves it.
>>>>
>>>> Which doesn't prove that it was Hezekiah's tunnel.
>>>
>>> Well, proving to a pro-abortion person that there is water running
>>> from Gihon spring to the pool of Siloam is like proving anything else
>>> to a pro-abortion person. My suggestion would be that we wait until
>>> Jesus Christ returns to earth and then ask him if there is water
>>> running through the tunnel.
>>> Robert B. Winn
>>
>>
>> From prochoice@killspam.bigfoot.com. in alt.abortion with
>> message-id on
>> Sun, 04 Jan 2004
>>
>> Here is a part of the discussion that occurred on this
>> subject some time ago. It demonstrates your inability to
>> relate anything with any degree of accuracy.
>>
>> Start of paste:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> I've been to Jerusalem, and have studied there quite
>> extensively. There are people that will take you on a guided
>> tour through anything you wish. Unfortunately, more than
>> 3/4s of these tours are bogus. You see, 85% of Jerusalem has
>> been destroyed and rebuilt just since the time of Christ.
>> Various wars, sand storms, and other natural disasters and
>> processes has taken it's toll. You keep repeating this
>> stupid argument about a tunnel that modern archeologists
>> cannot agree upon. I once seen a woman that looked like she
>> was in a state of catharsis after having gone on a "Jesus
>> walked this way to the cross" tour put on by some locals.
>> Unfortunately, no one has ever documented the path Jesus
>> took because those streets, buildings, etc.. have long been
>> turned to dust. They even went so far as to show them where
>> Jesus rested, and put his hand on a building. How
>> unfortunate that they didn't check the date on the
>> cornerstone of 1845.
>>
>> End of paste
>>
>> You were asked repeatedly at the time of the original
>> discussion how possible validation of one detail would
>> validate an entire book. You ignored or distorted this
>> question then and you are ignoring or distorting it now.
>>
>> I used the example of Gone With The Wind in the original
>> discussion and indicated under your 'one fact validation'
>> theory the fact that Atlanta exists and that the Civil War
>> actually occurred must prove beyond question every word in
>> GWTW is true. Where you went with that was fascinating. I
>> wonder if you will simply repeat yourself this time, or be
>> wrong in some new and original way?
>>
>> It would really be amazing if you were ever right about
>> anything.
>>
>> I am amused by the way you are determined to ignore anything
>> I say. I must have really hit a nerve with you. You have a
>> very low tolerance for fact.
>
>That's pretty amazing, that quote was almost verbatim what I told him in a
>previous post.
If you check the message
You will find it is your quote. In fact, everything between 'start of
paste' and 'end of paste' is your's. I really should add your ID to
that portion. In fact, I just did.
I put the entire message together to throw out occasionally when he
starts in on that tunnel again to show new readers he has been a nut
for a long time.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
