XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion   
   From: prochoice@here.now   
      
   On Tue, 11 May 2004 00:49:09 GMT, "Light Templar"   
    in alt.abortion with message-id   
   <9qVnc.15778$Hs1.650@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net> wrote:   
      
   >In news:qc70a0dibt3bmuvbkcgqk6vc1sh6tc9ol7@4ax.com,   
   >Attila  gave us all a good laugh with the following...   
   >   
   >> On Mon, 10 May 2004 22:49:16 GMT, "Light Templar"   
   >>  in alt.abortion with message-id   
   >>  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> In news:1pvv90lsrbf6rmesotlfc5r7plhrvfftpb@4ax.com,   
   >>> Attila  gave us all a good laugh with the   
   >>> following...   
   >>>   
   >>>> On 10 May 2004 07:01:30 -0700, rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B.   
   >>>> Winn) in alt.abortion with message-id   
   >>>> <7943568.0405100601.759170a1@posting.google.com> wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> "Light Templar" >>>>>>>> Hezekiah's   
   >>>>>>>>> tunnel was built as a conduit for water.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Prove it.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> I don't need to.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> You do if you wish to be taken seriously.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> The water running through the tunnel proves it.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Which doesn't prove that it was Hezekiah's tunnel.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Well, proving to a pro-abortion person that there is water running   
   >>>>> from Gihon spring to the pool of Siloam is like proving anything   
   >>>>> else to a pro-abortion person.  My suggestion would be that we   
   >>>>> wait until Jesus Christ returns to earth and then ask him if there   
   >>>>> is water running through the tunnel.   
   >>>>> Robert B. Winn   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> From prochoice@killspam.bigfoot.com. in alt.abortion with   
   >>>> message-id  on   
   >>>> Sun, 04 Jan 2004   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Here is a part of the discussion that occurred on this   
   >>>> subject some time ago. It demonstrates your inability to   
   >>>> relate anything with any degree of accuracy.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Start of paste:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>    
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> I've been to Jerusalem, and have studied there quite   
   >>>> extensively. There are people that will take you on a guided   
   >>>> tour through anything you wish. Unfortunately, more than   
   >>>> 3/4s of these tours are bogus. You see, 85% of Jerusalem has   
   >>>> been destroyed and rebuilt just since the time of Christ.   
   >>>> Various wars, sand storms, and other natural disasters and   
   >>>> processes has taken it's toll. You keep repeating this   
   >>>> stupid argument about a tunnel that modern archeologists   
   >>>> cannot agree upon. I once seen a woman that looked like she   
   >>>> was in a state of catharsis after having gone on a "Jesus   
   >>>> walked this way to the cross" tour put on by some locals.   
   >>>> Unfortunately, no one has ever documented the path Jesus   
   >>>> took because those streets, buildings, etc.. have long been   
   >>>> turned to dust. They even went so far as to show them where   
   >>>> Jesus rested, and put his hand on a building. How   
   >>>> unfortunate that they didn't check the date on the   
   >>>> cornerstone of 1845.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> End of paste   
   >>>>   
   >>>> You were asked repeatedly at the time of the original   
   >>>> discussion how possible validation of one detail would   
   >>>> validate an entire book. You ignored or distorted this   
   >>>> question then and you are ignoring or distorting it now.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> I used the example of Gone With The Wind in the original   
   >>>> discussion and indicated under your 'one fact validation'   
   >>>> theory the fact that Atlanta exists and that the Civil War   
   >>>> actually occurred must prove beyond question every word in   
   >>>> GWTW is true. Where you went with that was fascinating. I   
   >>>> wonder if you will simply repeat yourself this time, or be   
   >>>> wrong in some new and original way?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> It would really be amazing if you were ever right about   
   >>>> anything.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> I am amused by the way you are determined to ignore anything   
   >>>> I say. I must have really hit a nerve with you. You have a   
   >>>> very low tolerance for fact.    
   >>>   
   >>> That's pretty amazing, that quote was almost verbatim what I told   
   >>> him in a previous post.   
   >>   
   >> If you check the message   
   >>   
   >>     
   >>   
   >> You will find it is your quote.   
   >   
   >I know, I was being sarcastic.  :o)   
   >   
   >> In fact, everything between 'start of   
   >> paste' and 'end of paste' is your's.  I really should add your ID to   
   >> that portion.  In fact, I just did.   
   >>   
   >   
   >That's not necessary.   
      
   Yes, it is.  This was one of the first quotes I set up and did not   
   properly give credit, as I try to do now.   
      
   >   
   >> I put the entire message together to throw out occasionally when he   
   >> starts in on that tunnel again to show new readers he has been a nut   
   >> for a long time.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)