XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion   
   From: nachobiznez@all.com   
      
   "Robert B. Winn"  wrote in message   
   news:7943568.0405132223.5b2dd4c8@posting.google.com...   
   > "MrD"  wrote in message   
   news:...   
   > > "Robert B. Winn"  wrote in message   
   > > news:7943568.0405111824.750bb117@posting.google.com...   
   > > > "MrD"  wrote in message   
   > >  news:...   
   > > > > "Robert B. Winn"  wrote in message   
   > > > > news:7943568.0405110601.69db8795@posting.google.com...   
   > > > > > "MrD"  wrote in message   
   > >  news:...   
   > > > > > > "Light Templar"  > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > In every post you make.   
   > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > Blithering idiots do not pretend that they cannot tell   
   > > > > > > > > what a child is?  Thank you for noticing.   
   > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > I gave you the professional definition of what a child is,   
   from a   
   > >  peer   
   > > > > > > > reviewed medical publication.  There is nothing to pretend,   
   liar   
   > >  Robert.   
   > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > Winn has to pretend he doesn't know what a child is, else his   
   God is   
   > >  a   
   > >  child   
   > > > > > > killer and the people he persecutes aren't.  Puts him in a nasty   
   > >  position   
   > > > > > > that he doesn't want to realize is actually the reality of the   
   > >  situation.   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > I don't have to pretend anything.  I am not killing any children.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > You pretend to not know what a child is.  You even misquote the   
   > >  scriptures   
   > > > > in an attempt to justify your accusations of others.   
   > > >   
   > > > No, I do not misquote scriptures.  For instance, we have Luke 2:5  To   
   > > > be taxed with Mary his espoused wife, being great with child.   
   > >   
   > > Which is a misrepresentation of the translation 'being great with   
   child.'   
   > > You already knew that, though, so you are bearing false witness.   
   > > Again.   
   >   
   > Well, you might want to discuss the translation with Luke after the   
   > resurrection.  My belief is that Luke would approve the way it was   
   > translated.   
      
   If we have to wait for the resurrection, then I think it is only fair that   
   you refrain from using that personal translation until after the   
   resurrection when you have cleared it with 'Luke'.  You will be surprised to   
   find out that you might not be speaking with Luke, however.  You really seem   
   to have no idea who actually wrote the scriptures.  Someone today could   
   write the Gospel according to Elvis and state that he'd actually heard these   
   things from Elvis, but since Elvis is dead we couldn't actually confirm any   
   of it.   
   Elvis was resurrected, according to the Gospel of Elvis.   
   I'm sure you believe that too.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)