XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion   
   From: prochoice@here.now   
      
   On Mon, 17 May 2004 21:01:04 -0500, "MrD"  in   
   alt.abortion with message-id  wrote:   
      
      
   >> >   
   >> > "My bible says it's Hezekiah's tunne so it must be Hezekiah's tunnel!"   
   >> > All other evidence to the contrary he ignores completely.   
   >>   
   >> The only thing you ever said was that it could not be Hezekiah' tunnel   
   >> because it was described in the Bible.   
   >   
   >Actually, Robert, it was you who made that accusation of Light Templar's   
   >position.  It was never his argument.  I've paid attention throughout this   
   >entire discussion and he never made the argument that something is myth   
   >simply and only because it is in the bible.   
   > If you want to complain foolishly against an argument that you originally   
   >created in order to make yourself feel superior, go ahead.  We'll just laugh   
   >amongst ourselves at your foolishness.   
   >   
      
   The Winnut has consistently taken the position that if something is   
   mentioned in his bible that proves it is valid.  No other evidence is   
   necessary.  In fact, no evidence to the contrary will be tolerated.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)