XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion   
   From: nachobiznez@all.com   
      
   "Robert B. Winn" wrote in message   
   news:7943568.0405171610.23d399f5@posting.google.com...   
   > "MrD" wrote in message   
   news:...   
   > > "Robert B. Winn" wrote in message   
   > > news:7943568.0405161416.17aa1e56@posting.google.com...   
   > > > "MrD" wrote in message   
   > > news:...   
   > > > > "Robert B. Winn" wrote in message   
   > > > > news:7943568.0405151150.4bcceefa@posting.google.com...   
   > > > > > stoney wrote in message   
   > > news:...   
   > > > > > > On Thu, 13 May 2004 15:51:29 -0500, "MrD" ,   
   > > Message   
   > > > > > > ID: wrote in alt.atheism;   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > >"stoney" wrote in message   
   > > > > > > >news:5387a0lo94ns1233u3fopqukng9op6vvq9@4ax.com...   
   > > > > > > >> On Thu, 13 May 2004 08:03:48 -0500, "MrD"   
   ,   
   > > Message   
   > > > > > > >> ID: wrote in alt.atheism;   
   > > > > > > >>   
   > > > > > > >> >   
   > > > > > > >> >"junegill" wrote in message   
   > > > > > > >> >news:c7uo47$c4t$1@titan.btinternet.com...   
   > > > > > > >> >>   
   > > > > > > >> >> "MrD" wrote in message   
   > > > > > > >> >> news:c7uiui$svk$1@news.netins.net...   
   > > > > > > >> >> >   
   > > > > > > >> >> > "Robert B. Winn" wrote in   
   message   
   > > > > > > >> >> > news:7943568.0405121714.2b50c97c@posting.google.com...   
   > > > > > > >> >>   
   > > > > > > >> >> [snip]   
   > > > > > > >> >>   
   > > > > > > >> >> > > Well, it seemed like a good dictionary the day I   
   bought it   
   > > in   
   > > > > a   
   > > > > used   
   > > > > > > >> >> > > book store. I still like it. Do you find something   
   wrong   
   > > > > with   
   > > > > this   
   > > > > > > >> >> > > dictionary?   
   > > > > > > >> >> >   
   > > > > > > >> >> > You said, "As I understand it, you do not like   
   > > dictionaries."   
   > > > > > > >> >> > Yet you are only using one dictionary. I want to   
   discuss   
   > > what   
   > > > > the   
   > > > > other   
   > > > > > > >> >> > dictionaries say as well. I think it is you that does   
   not   
   > > like   
   > > > > > > >> >> > dictionaries. The dictionary you are using has many   
   skewed   
   > > > > > > definitions   
   > > > > > > that   
   > > > > > > >> >> > reflect the pro-christian bias of the editors.   
   > > > > > > >> >> > It appears to go out of it's way to influence word use   
   > > rather   
   > > > > than   
   > > > > reflect   
   > > > > > > >> >> > word use as dictionaries are supposed to.   
   > > > > > > >> >> > You will not want to discuss other dictionaries. You   
   are   
   > > unable   
   > > to   
   > > > > > > >> >> > contemplate the fact that they don't agree with your   
   > > predetermined   
   > > > > > > >> >> > conclusions.   
   > > > > > > >> >>   
   > > > > > > >> >> And while he cherishes this dictionary so much for its   
   > > definition   
   > > of   
   > > > > > > >> >> 'child', he won't accept its definition of adultery.   
   > >   
   > > > > > > >> >Excellent point, June.   
   > > > > > > >>   
   > > > > > > >> What else can be expected from the brain dead?   
   > >   
   > > > > > > >I'm thinking this is a trick question.   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > Curses! Mr. D found me out! :)   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > The definition for adultery in my dictionary agrees with Exodus 20   
   in   
   > > the   
   > > > > Bible.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > Delusions.   
   > > > > What has Exodus 20 to say of adultery? Do not commit adultery.   
   > > > > How does that agree with the dictionary definition, Robert Liar   
   Winn?   
   > > >   
   > > > Neither definition is trying to promote the practice of adultery the   
   way   
   > > you are.   
   > >   
   > > There is no definition of adultery in Exodus 20.   
   > > In what way am I promoting the practice of adultery, Robert?   
   > > I'm married and committed to my wife.   
   > > I don't promote anyone practicing adultery.   
   > > I am against worshiping people who are the product of adultery, like   
   Jesus.   
   > > If either of us were guilty of promoting adultery, it would be you,   
   since   
   > > you worship the product of adultery, the bastard Jesus.   
   >   
   > Since your accusation is against Jesus Christ, you need to discuss it with   
   him.   
      
   My accusation is squarely against you. You said that I promoted the   
   practice of adultery. I need to discuss this with you. Now explain it,   
   impotent Robert, you've made it clear I should discuss it with who I have   
   the accusation against. That's you and only you.   
   Let's go, before you start whining again.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|