XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion   
   From: nachobiznez@all.com   
      
   "Robert B. Winn"  wrote in message   
   news:7943568.0405181656.64e410aa@posting.google.com...   
   > "MrD"  wrote in message   
   news:...   
   > > "Robert B. Winn"  wrote in message   
   > > news:7943568.0405180511.69af7ee0@posting.google.com...   
   > > > "MrD"  wrote in message   
   > >  news:...   
   > > > > "Robert B. Winn"  wrote in message   
   > > > > news:7943568.0405171610.23d399f5@posting.google.com...   
   > > > > > "MrD"  wrote in message   
   > >  news:...   
   > > > > > > "Robert B. Winn"  wrote in message   
   > > > > > > news:7943568.0405161416.17aa1e56@posting.google.com...   
   > > > > > > > "MrD"  wrote in message   
   > >  news:...   
   > > > > > > > > "Robert B. Winn"  wrote in message   
   > > > > > > > > news:7943568.0405151150.4bcceefa@posting.google.com...   
   > > > > > > > > > stoney  wrote in message   
   > >  news:...   
   > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 13 May 2004 15:51:29 -0500, "MrD"   
   > >  ,   
   > >  Message   
   > > > > > > > > > > ID:  wrote in alt.atheism;   
   > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > >"stoney"  wrote in message   
   > > > > > > > > > > >news:5387a0lo94ns1233u3fopqukng9op6vvq9@4ax.com...   
   > > > > > > > > > > >> On Thu, 13 May 2004 08:03:48 -0500, "MrD"   
   > > > >  ,   
   > > > >  Message   
   > > > > > > > > > > >> ID:  wrote in   
   alt.atheism;   
   > > > > > > > > > > >>   
   > > > > > > > > > > >> >   
   > > > > > > > > > > >> >"junegill"  wrote in   
   message   
   > > > > > > > > > > >> >news:c7uo47$c4t$1@titan.btinternet.com...   
   > > > > > > > > > > >> >>   
   > > > > > > > > > > >> >> "MrD"  wrote in message   
   > > > > > > > > > > >> >> news:c7uiui$svk$1@news.netins.net...   
   > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >   
   > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > "Robert B. Winn"    
   wrote in   
   > >  message   
   > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >   
   > >  news:7943568.0405121714.2b50c97c@posting.google.com...   
   > > > > > > > > > > >> >>   
   > > > > > > > > > > >> >> [snip]   
   > > > > > > > > > > >> >>   
   > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > Well, it seemed like a good dictionary the day   
   I   
   > > > >  bought it   
   > > > >  in   
   > > > > > > > >  a   
   > > > > > > > >  used   
   > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > book store.  I still like it.  Do you find   
   > >  something   
   > >  wrong   
   > > > > > > > >  with   
   > > > > > > > >  this   
   > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > dictionary?   
   > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >   
   > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > You said, "As I understand it, you do not like   
   > >  dictionaries."   
   > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > Yet you are only using one dictionary.  I want   
   to   
   > > > >  discuss   
   > > > >  what   
   > > > > > > > >  the   
   > > > > > > > >  other   
   > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > dictionaries say as well.  I think it is you   
   that   
   > >  does   
   > > > >  not   
   > > > >  like   
   > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > dictionaries.  The dictionary you are using has   
   many   
   > >  skewed   
   > > > > > > > > > >  definitions   
   > > > > > > > > > >  that   
   > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > reflect the pro-christian bias of the editors.   
   > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > It appears to go out of it's way to influence   
   word   
   > >  use   
   > >  rather   
   > > > > > > > >  than   
   > > > > > > > >  reflect   
   > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > word use as dictionaries are supposed to.   
   > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > You will not want to discuss other dictionaries.   
   > >  You   
   > >  are   
   > > > > > >  unable   
   > > > > > >  to   
   > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > contemplate the fact that they don't agree with   
   your   
   > >  predetermined   
   > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > conclusions.   
   > > > > > > > > > > >> >>   
   > > > > > > > > > > >> >> And while he cherishes this dictionary so much for   
   its   
   > > > > > >  definition   
   > > > > > >  of   
   > > > > > > > > > > >> >> 'child', he won't accept its definition of   
   adultery.   
   > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > >> >Excellent point, June.   
   > > > > > > > > > > >>   
   > > > > > > > > > > >> What else can be expected from the brain dead?   
   > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > >I'm thinking this is a trick question.   
   > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > Curses!  Mr. D found me out!  :)   
   > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > The definition for adultery in my dictionary agrees with   
   > >  Exodus 20   
   > > > >  in   
   > > > >  the   
   > > > > > > > > Bible.   
   > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > Delusions.   
   > > > > > > > > What has Exodus 20 to say of adultery?   Do not commit   
   adultery.   
   > > > > > > > > How does that agree with the dictionary definition, Robert   
   Liar   
   > >  Winn?   
   > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > Neither definition is trying to promote the practice of   
   adultery   
   > >  the   
   > >  way   
   > > > > > > you are.   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > There is no definition of adultery in Exodus 20.   
   > > > > > > In what way am I promoting the practice of adultery, Robert?   
   > > > > > > I'm married and committed to my wife.   
   > > > > > > I don't promote anyone practicing adultery.   
   > > > > > > I am against worshiping people who are the product of adultery,   
   like   
   > >  Jesus.   
   > > > > > > If either of us were guilty of promoting adultery, it would be   
   you,   
   > >  since   
   > > > > > > you worship the product of adultery, the bastard Jesus.   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > Since your accusation is against Jesus Christ, you need to discuss   
   it   
   > >  with   
   > > > > him.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > My accusation is squarely against you.  You said that I promoted the   
   > > > > practice of adultery. I need to discuss this with you.  Now explain   
   it,   
   > > > > impotent Robert, you've made it clear I should discuss it with who I   
   > >  have   
   > > > > the accusation against.  That's you and only you.   
   > > > > Let's go, before you start whining again.   
   > > >   
   > > > Well, people who thirst for innocent blood the way you do are   
   > > > definitely in favor of all the adultery they can encourage because   
   > > > adultery and fornication result in numerous unwanted pregnancies which   
   > > > can be terminated in a pro-abortion government by abortion, thus   
   > > > fulfilling the need for homicides of children that exists in your   
   > > > mind.   
   > >   
   > > Still trying to play god, eh Robert?  Unfortunately for your position, I   
   > > don't hold any of the views that you are projecting upon me.  I do not   
   > > thirst for innocent blood.  I don't even pretend to drink blood like you   
   do   
   > > every week when you take your 'sacrament'.  I don't have a need for   
   > > homicides of children existing in my mind like you do who delights in   
   the   
   > > notion of Jesus coming to judge the world, throwing the majority of   
   children   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)