XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion   
   From: prochoice@here.now   
      
   On 19 May 2004 04:40:51 -0700, rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B.   
   Winn) in alt.abortion with message-id   
   <7943568.0405190340.4d1c1c95@posting.google.com> wrote:   
      
      
   >>   
   >> Unless it is proven to be accurate by independent sources, I consider it to   
   >> be unproven assertion.   
   >>   
   >> Can you prove that a rabbit chews its cud?   
   >   
   >You have offered no evidence at all.  All you said was that scientists   
   >had made this statement about the tunnel.  That does not surprise me   
   >at all.  For everything in existence, there is an atheist scientist   
      
   An atheist scientist of course being one who proves anything in your   
   bible is wrong.   
      
   >who will make an opposing statement.  If you want to say who the   
   >scientist was who said this and what he said, that would be fine.  My   
   >belief is that the inscription was put on the wall of the tunnel when   
   >it was completed in 701 B. C.   
   >Robert B. winn   
      
   What you believe is irrelevant.  Where is your proof?  The evidence to   
   support your position?  Bearing in mind your bible is not evidence of   
   anything.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)