XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion   
   From: prochoice@here.now   
      
   On 19 May 2004 06:53:54 -0700, rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B.   
   Winn) in alt.abortion with message-id   
   <7943568.0405190553.6b2c9c97@posting.google.com> wrote:   
      
      
   >>   
   >> I explain that by saying that the patina in the inscription and the patina   
   >> in the tunnel walls do not match.  If the incription was made in Hezekiah's   
   >> time, then the tunnel was dug 500 years earlier.    If the tunnel is indeed   
   >> Hezekiah's, then the inscription was made 500 years later.   The tunnel was   
   >> scientifically aged to approx. 1200 BCE.   Exactly the time that the tunnel   
   >> would have been built for the inscription to have been carved in Hezekiah's   
   >> time.   
   >>   
   >> In other words, the physical evidence doesn't currently show that it is   
   >> Hezekiah's tunnel.   
   >>   
   >> How do you explain that?   
   >   
   >I would explain it by saying that your atheistic scientists do not   
   >know what they are talking about.   
   >Robert B. winn   
      
   How do you know that?  What forms the basis of that statement?   
   How do you know the scientists were atheists?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)