XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion   
   From: nachobiznez@all.com   
      
   "Light Templar"  wrote in message   
   news:L4Uqc.2957$be.857@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...   
   > While Robert B. Winn was contemplating his or her navel in   
   > news:7943568.0405191742.53ab38f6@posting.google.com,   
   >  he or she gave us all a good laugh with the   
   > following...   
   >   
   > > "Light Templar"  wrote in message   
   > > news:...   
   > >> While Robert B. Winn was contemplating his or her navel in   
   > >> news:7943568.0405181649.6316ec25@posting.google.com,   
   > >>  he or she gave us all a good laugh with   
   > >> the following...   
   > >>   
   > >>> "MrD"  wrote in message   
   > >>> news:...   
   > >>>> "Robert B. Winn"  wrote in message   
   > >>>> news:7943568.0405172251.28266230@posting.google.com...   
   > >>>>> "MrD"  wrote in message   
   > >>  news:...   
   > >>>>>> "Attila"  wrote in message   
   > >>>>>> news:7rria0lp7osgmioqnav2300rqvpe8o9os2@4ax.com...   
   > >>>>>>> On Mon, 17 May 2004 21:06:04 -0500, "MrD"    
   > >>>>>>> in alt.abortion with message-id    
   > >>>>>>> wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> "Attila"  wrote in message   
   > >>>>>>>> news:d5aia01l6381ehqmsrr201uuqo3ggddkk8@4ax.com...   
   > >>>>>>>>> On Mon, 17 May 2004 14:28:45 -0500, "MrD"   
   > >>>>>>>>>  in alt.abortion with message-id   
   > >>>>>>>>>  wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>> "Attila"  wrote in message   
   > >>>>>>>>>> news:eljha0dqpuldic5ub1qgt5qes1npitg7ti@4ax.com...   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 17 May 2004 07:52:43 -0500, "MrD"   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>    
   > >>  in   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> alt.abortion with message-id    
   > >>  wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> "Attila"  wrote in message   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> news:4kbha0dqhovsr8bqlmadf5as4c2ov6bhh1@4ax.com...   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 17 May 2004 06:38:18 -0500, "MrD"   
   > >>>>     
   > >>>>  in   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>> alt.abortion with message-id   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>    
   > >>  wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't write lies.  Why don't you just show that   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> atheists   
   > >>>>  are   
   > >>>>  not   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> forbidden to discuss Hezekiah's tunnel by discussing it?   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I already have, so your argument is a total disgrace to   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> your   
   > >>  honor.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm happy to discuss the tunnel that you think is   
   > >>  Hezekiah's.   
   > >>>>>>  The   
   > >>>>>>  problem   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> is that you aren't able to discuss it honestly.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I would still like to know who it is that forbids atheists   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>> to   
   > >>  discuss   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>> anything but I suppose I will never find out.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> It's forbidden to discuss?   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> That is what the Winnut keeps saying.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> "Why don't you just show that atheists are not   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> forbidden to discuss Hezekiah's tunnel by discussing it?"   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>> I'm perfectly willing to discuss this tunnel, how about you?   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>> Do you mean discuss it with me or the Winnut?   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>> I know nothing about it but that hasn't stopped me in the   
   > >>>>>>>>> past.    
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> Winnut, as you call him, set forward an experiment whereas we   
   > >>>>>>>> can   
   > >>>>  show   
   > >>>>  that   
   > >>>>>>>> atheists aren't forbidden to discuss Hezekiah's supposed tunnel   
   > >>>>>>>> by discussing it.  Here we are discussing it.  Guess he's got   
   > >>>>>>>> his   
   > >>  result.   
   > >>>>>>>> I've read just a bit about it and it's pretty clear that it's   
   > >>>>>>>> old,   
   > >>>>  but   
   > >>>>  it's   
   > >>>>>>>> disconcerting to find an inscription by the diggers that didn't   
   > >>>>>>>> give   
   > >>  some   
   > >>>>>>>> homage to the king if he was so inspired as to tell them to dig   
   > >>>>>>>> in   
   > >>  such a   
   > >>>>>>>> way that had never been tried before.  This was a first, a   
   > >>>>>>>> totally horizontal dig from two start points, connecting up.   
   > >>>>>>>> If Hezekiah had ordered it, he would have been praised all   
   > >>>>>>>> over the place for the   
   > >>  insight.   
   > >>>>>>>> I think it was someone much more common who thought it wise to   
   > >>>>>>>> follow   
   > >>  the   
   > >>>>>>>> fissure in the rock  that leaked water to the pool during the   
   > >>>>>>>> higher   
   > >>  water   
   > >>>>>>>> periods.   
   > >>>>>>>> Wow, we are just discussing away on this tunnel.   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> I agree a new engineering method that yielded such useful   
   > >>>>>>> results would have not only been mentioned but emulated,  The   
   > >>>>>>> King, in fact, would have wanted to get as much credit as   
   > >>>>>>> possible by advertising such a useful method far and wide.  It   
   > >>>>>>> is much more likely someone simply followed the water to see   
   > >>>>>>> where it came from.   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> One problem with those pesky tunnels is how hard it is to be   
   > >>>>>>> certain exactly when they were built.   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> I am still waiting for someone to forbid me to discuss this, but   
   > >>>>>>> so far I have detected nothing.  Perhaps it's another one of   
   > >>>>>>> those pesky gods who is failing his responsibilities.   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> I, too, seem unable to find anyone who is able to forbid me to   
   > >>>>>> discuss   
   > >>  this   
   > >>>>>> tunnel.   
   > >>>>>> I guess Wicked Winn is just Whack.   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> Well, the problem with that is that you have not discussed it with   
   > >>>>>  me. I would still have to believe that your leader satan does not   
   > >>>>> want it discussed with me.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> Switching the goals, eh Robert?   You stated that atheists were   
   > >>>> apparently forbidden to discuss it.  I have shown that atheists   
   > >>>> have no trouble discussing it.  I have even discussed it with you.   
   > >>>> Therefore your entire 'satan' argument is shown to be fatally   
   > >>>> flawed.  Much like your character.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> Well, any time you want to discuss Hezekiah's tunnel, God's plan of   
   > >>> salvation leaves you free to discuss it, whatever satan may have   
   > >>> told you.   
   > >>   
   > >> We have been discussing it liar Robert, but you continue to dodge the   
   > >> conversation.   
   > >   
   > > What did you think about the water flowing through the tunnel?   
   > > Robert B. Winn   
   >   
   > Water flows down hill, yippee!  Still doesn't prove that the tunnel is   
   > Hezekiah's, try again.   
   >   
      
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)