XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion   
   From: nachobiznez@all.com   
      
   "Light Templar"  wrote in message   
   news:bZSqc.2852$be.2216@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...   
   > While Robert B. Winn was contemplating his or her navel in   
   > news:7943568.0405191625.78628b5@posting.google.com,   
   >  he or she gave us all a good laugh with the   
   > following...   
   >   
   > > "MrD"  wrote in message   
   > > news:...   
   > >> "Robert B. Winn"  wrote in message   
   > >> news:7943568.0405190404.6e9401fb@posting.google.com...   
   > >>> "MrD"  wrote in message   
   > >>  news:...   
   > >>>> "Robert B. Winn"  wrote in message   
   > >>>> news:7943568.0405171919.24b141b2@posting.google.com...   
   > >>>>> "MrD"  wrote in message   
   > >>  news:...   
   > >>>>>> "Robert B. Winn"  wrote in message   
   > >>>>>> news:7943568.0405161416.17aa1e56@posting.google.com...   
   > >>>>>>> "MrD"  wrote in message   
   > >>  news:...   
   > >>>>>>>> "Robert B. Winn"  wrote in message   
   > >>>>>>>> news:7943568.0405151150.4bcceefa@posting.google.com...   
   > >>>>>>>>> stoney  wrote in message   
   > >>  news:...   
   > >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 13 May 2004 15:51:29 -0500, "MrD"   
   > >>  ,   
   > >>  Message   
   > >>>>>>>>>> ID:  wrote in alt.atheism;   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> "stoney"  wrote in message   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> news:5387a0lo94ns1233u3fopqukng9op6vvq9@4ax.com...   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 13 May 2004 08:03:48 -0500, "MrD"   
   > >>>>  ,   
   > >>>>  Message   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> ID:  wrote in alt.atheism;   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>> "junegill"  wrote in message   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>> news:c7uo47$c4t$1@titan.btinternet.com...   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "MrD"  wrote in message   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:c7uiui$svk$1@news.netins.net...   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Robert B. Winn"  wrote in   
   > >>  message   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>  news:7943568.0405121714.2b50c97c@posting.google.com...   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [snip]   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, it seemed like a good dictionary the day I   
   > >>>>  bought it   
   > >>>>  in   
   > >>>>>>>>  a   
   > >>>>>>>>  used   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> book store.  I still like it.  Do you find   
   > >>  something   
   > >>  wrong   
   > >>>>>>>>  with   
   > >>>>>>>>  this   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dictionary?   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You said, "As I understand it, you do not like   
   > >>  dictionaries."   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yet you are only using one dictionary.  I want to   
   > >>>>  discuss   
   > >>>>  what   
   > >>>>>>>>  the   
   > >>>>>>>>  other   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dictionaries say as well.  I think it is you that   
   > >>  does   
   > >>>>  not   
   > >>>>  like   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dictionaries.  The dictionary you are using has many   
   > >>  skewed   
   > >>>>>>>>>>  definitions   
   > >>>>>>>>>>  that   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reflect the pro-christian bias of the editors.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It appears to go out of it's way to influence word   
   > >>  use   
   > >>  rather   
   > >>>>>>>>  than   
   > >>>>>>>>  reflect   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> word use as dictionaries are supposed to.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You will not want to discuss other dictionaries.   
   > >>  You   
   > >>  are   
   > >>>>>>  unable   
   > >>>>>>  to   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contemplate the fact that they don't agree with your   
   > >>  predetermined   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conclusions.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> And while he cherishes this dictionary so much for its   
   > >>>>>>  definition   
   > >>>>>>  of   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'child', he won't accept its definition of adultery.   
   > >>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Excellent point, June.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> What else can be expected from the brain dead?   
   > >>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> I'm thinking this is a trick question.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>> Curses!  Mr. D found me out!  :)   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>> The definition for adultery in my dictionary agrees with   
   > >>  Exodus 20   
   > >>>>  in   
   > >>>>  the   
   > >>>>>>>> Bible.   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> Delusions.   
   > >>>>>>>> What has Exodus 20 to say of adultery?   Do not commit   
   > >>>>>>>> adultery. How does that agree with the dictionary definition,   
   > >>>>>>>> Robert Liar   
   > >>  Winn?   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> Neither definition is trying to promote the practice of adultery   
   > >>  the   
   > >>  way   
   > >>>>>> you are.   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> There is no definition of adultery in Exodus 20.   
   > >>>>>> In what way am I promoting the practice of adultery, Robert?   
   > >>>>>> I'm married and committed to my wife.   
   > >>>>>> I don't promote anyone practicing adultery.   
   > >>>>>> I am against worshiping people who are the product of adultery,   
   > >>>>>> like   
   > >>  Jesus.   
   > >>>>>> If either of us were guilty of promoting adultery, it would be   
   > >>>>>> you,   
   > >>  since   
   > >>>>>> you worship the product of adultery, the bastard Jesus.   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> So you claim that is supposed to confuse me about adultery?   
   > >>>>> People who do not commit adultery do not have the problems of   
   > >>>>> people who do commit adultery.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> Well, that makes it clear that I don't commit adultery.  I  don't   
   > >>>> have   
   > >>  the   
   > >>>> problems of people who do commit adultery.   Yet you promote   
   > >>>> adultery,   
   > >>  by   
   > >>>> worshipping the product of adultery, the bastard Jesus.  I assume   
   > >>>> that   
   > >>  you   
   > >>>> are picking up the problems of people who promote adultery, such as   
   > >>  bearing   
   > >>>> false witness.  Yes, that is plain.   
   > >>>> I suggest you stop promoting adultery.  It is not good to be an   
   > >>  adulterer.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> Well, I think you would be in a good position to tell whether it is   
   > >>> good to be an adulterer.   
   > >>   
   > >> Thank you for admitting that and for supporting my position that I   
   > >> am not an adulterer and that you are promoting adultery.   
   > >> I'm surprised that you are being honest for a change.  I guess I   
   > >> should suspect some trick on your part. Will you be able to maintain   
   > >> this honesty? How long do you suppose it took for two crews to hack   
   > >> out "Hezekiah's" Tunnel?   
   > >   
   > > Not very long.  The Assyrians took about forty Judean cities before   
   > > they besieged Jerusalem.  The idea of the tunnel was to hide the water   
   > > from Gihon spring so that the Assyrians could not use it when the   
   > > siege started.  My opinion is that it took less than a year to dig the   
   > > tunnel.   
   > > Robert B. Winn   
   >   
   > Let's see...  1750 ft through solid stone...  Probably not.   
   >   
   It would be nice if we could find some estimate somewhere, but I agree with   
   you.   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)