XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion   
   From: prochoice@here.now   
      
   On 20 May 2004 06:23:26 -0700, rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B.   
   Winn) in alt.abortion with message-id   
   <7943568.0405200523.370502a4@posting.google.com> wrote:   
      
      
   >> >>   
   >> >> Why are the tunnel walls 500 odd years older than the inscription   
   >> >> within, which was cut near Hezekiah's time?  Perhaps the tunnel was   
   >> >> cut to hide water from some earlier war party, but no one was   
   >> >> recording such events at that time.  The scientific dating of the   
   >> >> walls is pretty indicative that the bible made a false claim about   
   >> >> the age of the tunnel.   
   >> >   
   >> > Well, I would not think so.   
   >> > Robert B. Winn   
   >>   
   >> That's it??  That's all the rebuttal you have to offer?   
   >   
   >Why would anything else be needed.  People trying to discredit the   
   >Bible can come up with all kinds of ideas.  So far all you have done   
   >is claim that the inscription was made 500 years after the tunnel was   
   >dug without showing any proof whatsoever except that some atheist   
   >scientist   
      
   What makes you think the scientist in question was an atheist?   
      
   >said so.  It seems to me that the people who dug the tunnel   
   >would have a better idea about when it was dug.   
   >Robert B. Winn   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)