XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism
XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion
From: nachobiznez@all.com
"Robert B. Winn" wrote in message
news:7943568.0405201307.481b1854@posting.google.com...
> "MrD" wrote in message
news:...
> > "Robert B. Winn" wrote in message
> > news:7943568.0405200528.657fe049@posting.google.com...
> > > "Light Templar" wrote in message
> > news:...
> > > > While Robert B. Winn was contemplating his or her navel in
> > > > news:7943568.0405191625.78628b5@posting.google.com,
> > > > he or she gave us all a good laugh with
the
> > > > following...
> > > >
> > > > > "MrD" wrote in message
> > > > > news:...
> > > > >> "Robert B. Winn" wrote in message
> > > > >> news:7943568.0405190404.6e9401fb@posting.google.com...
> > > > >>> "MrD" wrote in message
> > news:...
> > > > >>>> "Robert B. Winn" wrote in message
> > > > >>>> news:7943568.0405171919.24b141b2@posting.google.com...
> > > > >>>>> "MrD" wrote in message
> > news:...
> > > > >>>>>> "Robert B. Winn" wrote in message
> > > > >>>>>> news:7943568.0405161416.17aa1e56@posting.google.com...
> > > > >>>>>>> "MrD" wrote in message
> > news:...
> > > > >>>>>>>> "Robert B. Winn" wrote in
message
> > > > >>>>>>>> news:7943568.0405151150.4bcceefa@posting.google.com...
> > > > >>>>>>>>> stoney wrote in message
> > news:...
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 13 May 2004 15:51:29 -0500, "MrD"
> > > > >> ,
> > > > >> Message
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> ID: wrote in alt.atheism;
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> "stoney" wrote in message
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> news:5387a0lo94ns1233u3fopqukng9op6vvq9@4ax.com...
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 13 May 2004 08:03:48 -0500, "MrD"
> > > > >>>> ,
> > > > >>>> Message
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> ID: wrote in
alt.atheism;
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> "junegill" wrote in message
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> news:c7uo47$c4t$1@titan.btinternet.com...
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "MrD" wrote in message
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:c7uiui$svk$1@news.netins.net...
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Robert B. Winn" wrote in
> > message
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > news:7943568.0405121714.2b50c97c@posting.google.com...
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [snip]
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, it seemed like a good dictionary the day I
> > > > >>>> bought it
> > > > >>>> in
> > > > >>>>>>>> a
> > > > >>>>>>>> used
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> book store. I still like it. Do you find
> > > > >> something
> > > > >> wrong
> > > > >>>>>>>> with
> > > > >>>>>>>> this
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dictionary?
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You said, "As I understand it, you do not like
> > dictionaries."
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yet you are only using one dictionary. I want to
> > > > >>>> discuss
> > > > >>>> what
> > > > >>>>>>>> the
> > > > >>>>>>>> other
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dictionaries say as well. I think it is you that
> > does
> > > > >>>> not
> > > > >>>> like
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dictionaries. The dictionary you are using has many
> > skewed
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> definitions
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> that
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reflect the pro-christian bias of the editors.
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It appears to go out of it's way to influence word
> > > > >> use
> > > > >> rather
> > > > >>>>>>>> than
> > > > >>>>>>>> reflect
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> word use as dictionaries are supposed to.
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You will not want to discuss other dictionaries.
> > > > >> You
> > > > >> are
> > > > >>>>>> unable
> > > > >>>>>> to
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contemplate the fact that they don't agree with your
> > predetermined
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conclusions.
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> And while he cherishes this dictionary so much for
its
> > > > >>>>>> definition
> > > > >>>>>> of
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'child', he won't accept its definition of adultery.
> >
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Excellent point, June.
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> What else can be expected from the brain dead?
> >
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> I'm thinking this is a trick question.
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Curses! Mr. D found me out! :)
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>> The definition for adultery in my dictionary agrees with
> > Exodus 20
> > > > >>>> in
> > > > >>>> the
> > > > >>>>>>>> Bible.
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>> Delusions.
> > > > >>>>>>>> What has Exodus 20 to say of adultery? Do not commit
> > > > >>>>>>>> adultery. How does that agree with the dictionary
definition,
> > > > >>>>>>>> Robert Liar
> > Winn?
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> Neither definition is trying to promote the practice of
adultery
> > > > >> the
> > > > >> way
> > > > >>>>>> you are.
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> There is no definition of adultery in Exodus 20.
> > > > >>>>>> In what way am I promoting the practice of adultery, Robert?
> > > > >>>>>> I'm married and committed to my wife.
> > > > >>>>>> I don't promote anyone practicing adultery.
> > > > >>>>>> I am against worshiping people who are the product of
adultery,
> > > > >>>>>> like
> > Jesus.
> > > > >>>>>> If either of us were guilty of promoting adultery, it would
be
> > > > >>>>>> you,
> > since
> > > > >>>>>> you worship the product of adultery, the bastard Jesus.
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> So you claim that is supposed to confuse me about adultery?
> > > > >>>>> People who do not commit adultery do not have the problems of
> > > > >>>>> people who do commit adultery.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Well, that makes it clear that I don't commit adultery. I
don't
> > > > >>>> have
> > the
> > > > >>>> problems of people who do commit adultery. Yet you promote
> > > > >>>> adultery,
> > by
> > > > >>>> worshipping the product of adultery, the bastard Jesus. I
assume
> > > > >>>> that
> > you
> > > > >>>> are picking up the problems of people who promote adultery,
such as
> > bearing
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
