XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism
XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion
From: nachobiznez@all.com
"Robert B. Winn" wrote in message
news:7943568.0405201753.12304044@posting.google.com...
> "Light Templar" wrote in message
news:...
> > While Robert B. Winn was contemplating his or her navel in
> > news:7943568.0405200518.54a8a27f@posting.google.com,
> > he or she gave us all a good laugh with the
> > following...
> >
> > > "Light Templar" wrote in message
> > > news:...
> > >> While Robert B. Winn was contemplating his or her navel in
> > >> news:7943568.0405191946.1f45143c@posting.google.com,
> > >> he or she gave us all a good laugh with
> > >> the following...
> > >>
> > >>> "Light Templar" wrote in message
> > >>> news:<14Qqc.2621$be.509@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>...
> > >>>> While Robert B. Winn was contemplating his or her navel in
> > >>>> news:7943568.0405190351.21e3b809@posting.google.com,
> > >>>> he or she gave us all a good laugh with
> > >>>> the following...
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> "Light Templar" wrote in message
> > >>>>> news:...
> > >>>>>> While Robert B. Winn was contemplating his or her navel in
> > >>>>>> news:7943568.0405181645.3e4e5d82@posting.google.com,
> > >>>>>> he or she gave us all a good laugh
> > >>>>>> with the following...
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> "Light Templar" wrote in message
> > >>>>>>> news:<4zkqc.8$be.0@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>...
> > >>>>>>>> While Robert B. Winn was contemplating his or her navel in
> > >>>>>>>> news:7943568.0405171921.e6fd526@posting.google.com,
> > >>>>>>>> he or she gave us all a good laugh
> > >>>>>>>> with the following...
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> "Light Templar" wrote in message
> > >>>>>>>>> news:...
> > >>>>>>>>>> While Robert B. Winn was contemplating his or her navel in
> > >>>>>>>>>> news:7943568.0405170501.5394c161@posting.google.com,
> > >>>>>>>>>> he or she gave us all a good laugh
> > >>>>>>>>>> with the following...
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> "Light Templar" wrote in message
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
news:...
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> In news:7943568.0405151154.70c382d6@posting.google.com,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Robert B. Winn gave us all a
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> good laugh with the following...
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> "Light Templar" wrote in message
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
news:...
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In news:7943568.0405150543.d16a95f@posting.google.com,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Robert B. Winn > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When and where did he say this? When was the child
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> named Immanuel? Who called him Immanuel? Where are
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your facts, Robert? Where is your evidence?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Isaiah was a drunken fool.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Isaiah chapter 9. Immanuel means God with us.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Immanuel means the same thing as Messiah. As you
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will notice, Jesus Christ said that he was the
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Messiah.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But he wasn't named Immanuel. That was a title, not a
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> name.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Very good. Are you saying that you are beginning to
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comprehend why Jesus was called Immanuel?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> At what point was Jesus NAMED Immanuel?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> From the time of Isaiah's prophecy.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Robert B. Winn
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Then why didn't Mary, Joseph, any of the disciples, his
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> friends, the priests, or anyone else call him Immanuel? I
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> can title you "The Idiot", and it is well deserved, but
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> that still wouldn't be your name, do you see the
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> difference?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Well, why don't you just wait until the resurrection occurs
> > >>>>>>>>>>> and ask these people? Isaiah called him Immanuel, which
> > >>>>>>>>>>> means, God with us.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> But it wasn't his name. If you prove that the ressurection
> > >>>>>>>>>> will occur, I will accept your terms.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Well, why don't we all just wait?
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Nope. Since you choose to use your religion in your arguments
> > >>>>>>>> and make assertions concerning your religion, then it is
> > >>>>>>>> logically expected that you prove your assertions.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> When Christ returns, you will have
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Prove that he is returning, and I will accept your terms.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> the sign you seek.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> I seek no sign, I expect you to prove your assertions.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Well, for instance, Hezekiah's tunnel is right where the Bible
> > >>>>>>> says it was dug.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> This does not constitute proof. The bible also claims that
> > >>>>>> rabbits chew their cud. We know that this is not true. The
> > >>>>>> bible claimes that the tunnel in question was built by Hezekiah.
> > >>>>>> How are we to know that the bible is any more accurate on this
> > >>>>>> point than it is about the rabbits?
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> No, say atheists, Hezekiah's tunnel does not exist.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> No liar Robert, no one here has said that, not even once. Since
> > >>>>>> you are so incredibly dense, I will outline the argument. The
> > >>>>>> tunnel exists. It's your claim that it was built by Hezekiah
> > >>>>>> that is in question. The physical evidence doesn't support that
> > >>>>>> the tunnel was built by Hezekiah.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> We said
> > >>>>>>> it did not exist. The same is true of anything else,
> > >>>>>>> whatsoever. Atheists are capable of saying they do not
> > >>>>>>> understand it exists.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Nonsense. Liar Robert. You're just babbling now.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Well, the passages in question are from 2 Kings, 2 Chronicles, and
> > >>>>> Isaiah, which all say that the tunnel was dug during the reign of
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
