XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism
XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion
From: nachobiznez@all.com
"Light Templar" wrote in message
news:5Gurc.4844$be.509@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> While Robert B. Winn was contemplating his or her navel in
> news:7943568.0405210528.3626b8bb@posting.google.com,
> he or she gave us all a good laugh with the
> following...
>
> > "Light Templar" wrote in message
> > news:<7%9rc.3782$be.1546@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>...
> >> While Robert B. Winn was contemplating his or her navel in
> >> news:7943568.0405200528.657fe049@posting.google.com,
> >> he or she gave us all a good laugh with
> >> the following...
> >>
> >>> "Light Templar" wrote in message
> >>> news:...
> >>>> While Robert B. Winn was contemplating his or her navel in
> >>>> news:7943568.0405191625.78628b5@posting.google.com,
> >>>> he or she gave us all a good laugh with
> >>>> the following...
> >>>>
> >>>>> "MrD" wrote in message
> >>>>> news:...
> >>>>>> "Robert B. Winn" wrote in message
> >>>>>> news:7943568.0405190404.6e9401fb@posting.google.com...
> >>>>>>> "MrD" wrote in message
> >> news:...
> >>>>>>>> "Robert B. Winn" wrote in message
> >>>>>>>> news:7943568.0405171919.24b141b2@posting.google.com...
> >>>>>>>>> "MrD" wrote in message
> >> news:...
> >>>>>>>>>> "Robert B. Winn" wrote in message
> >>>>>>>>>> news:7943568.0405161416.17aa1e56@posting.google.com...
> >>>>>>>>>>> "MrD" wrote in message
> >> news:...
> >>>>>>>>>>>> "Robert B. Winn" wrote in
> >>>>>>>>>>>> message
> >>>>>>>>>>>> news:7943568.0405151150.4bcceefa@posting.google.com...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> stoney wrote in message
> >> news:...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 13 May 2004 15:51:29 -0500, "MrD"
> >>>>>> ,
> >>>>>> Message
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ID: wrote in alt.atheism;
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "stoney" wrote in message
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:5387a0lo94ns1233u3fopqukng9op6vvq9@4ax.com...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 13 May 2004 08:03:48 -0500, "MrD"
> >>>>>>>> ,
> >>>>>>>> Message
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ID: wrote in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alt.atheism;
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "junegill" wrote in message
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:c7uo47$c4t$1@titan.btinternet.com...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "MrD" wrote in message
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:c7uiui$svk$1@news.netins.net...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Robert B. Winn" wrote in
> >> message
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> news:7943568.0405121714.2b50c97c@posting.google.com...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [snip]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, it seemed like a good dictionary the day I
> >>>>>>>> bought it
> >>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>> a
> >>>>>>>>>>>> used
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> book store. I still like it. Do you find
> >>>>>> something
> >>>>>> wrong
> >>>>>>>>>>>> with
> >>>>>>>>>>>> this
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dictionary?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You said, "As I understand it, you do not like
> >> dictionaries."
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yet you are only using one dictionary. I want to
> >>>>>>>> discuss
> >>>>>>>> what
> >>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>> other
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dictionaries say as well. I think it is you that
> >> does
> >>>>>>>> not
> >>>>>>>> like
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dictionaries. The dictionary you are using has many
> >> skewed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> definitions
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reflect the pro-christian bias of the editors.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It appears to go out of it's way to influence word
> >>>>>> use
> >>>>>> rather
> >>>>>>>>>>>> than
> >>>>>>>>>>>> reflect
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> word use as dictionaries are supposed to.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You will not want to discuss other dictionaries.
> >>>>>> You
> >>>>>> are
> >>>>>>>>>> unable
> >>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contemplate the fact that they don't agree with your
> >> predetermined
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conclusions.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And while he cherishes this dictionary so much for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> its
> >>>>>>>>>> definition
> >>>>>>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'child', he won't accept its definition of adultery.
> >>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Excellent point, June.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What else can be expected from the brain dead?
> >>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm thinking this is a trick question.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Curses! Mr. D found me out! :)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The definition for adultery in my dictionary agrees with
> >> Exodus 20
> >>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Bible.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Delusions.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> What has Exodus 20 to say of adultery? Do not commit
> >>>>>>>>>>>> adultery. How does that agree with the dictionary
> >>>>>>>>>>>> definition, Robert Liar
> >> Winn?
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Neither definition is trying to promote the practice of
> >>>>>>>>>>> adultery
> >>>>>> the
> >>>>>> way
> >>>>>>>>>> you are.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> There is no definition of adultery in Exodus 20.
> >>>>>>>>>> In what way am I promoting the practice of adultery, Robert?
> >>>>>>>>>> I'm married and committed to my wife.
> >>>>>>>>>> I don't promote anyone practicing adultery.
> >>>>>>>>>> I am against worshiping people who are the product of
> >>>>>>>>>> adultery, like
> >> Jesus.
> >>>>>>>>>> If either of us were guilty of promoting adultery, it would
> >>>>>>>>>> be you,
> >> since
> >>>>>>>>>> you worship the product of adultery, the bastard Jesus.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> So you claim that is supposed to confuse me about adultery?
> >>>>>>>>> People who do not commit adultery do not have the problems of
> >>>>>>>>> people who do commit adultery.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Well, that makes it clear that I don't commit adultery. I
> >>>>>>>> don't have
> >> the
> >>>>>>>> problems of people who do commit adultery. Yet you promote
> >>>>>>>> adultery,
> >> by
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
