XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion   
   From: nachobiznez@all.com   
      
   "Light Templar"  wrote in message   
   news:iQNrc.18924$zO3.15967@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...   
   > While Robert B. Winn was contemplating his or her navel in   
   > news:7943568.0405221117.284e8687@posting.google.com,   
   >  he or she gave us all a good laugh with the   
   > following...   
   >   
   > > "Light Templar"  wrote in message   
   > > news:...   
   > >> While Robert B. Winn was contemplating his or her navel in   
   > >> news:7943568.0405211611.267e732d@posting.google.com,   
   > >>  he or she gave us all a good laugh with   
   > >> the following...   
   > >>   
   > >>> --sexkitten--  wrote in message   
   > >>> news:<2h6vc1F9hjjlU1@uni-berlin.de>...   
   > >>>> Robert B. Winn wrote:   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>> "Light Templar"  wrote in message   
   > >>>>> news:...   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>>> While Robert B. Winn was contemplating his or her navel in   
   > >>>>>> news:7943568.0405201737.73d82f06@posting.google.com,   
   > >>>>>>  he or she gave us all a good laugh   
   > >>>>>> with the following...   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> "Light Templar"  wrote in message   
   > >>>>>>> news:...   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> While Robert B. Winn was contemplating his or her navel in   
   > >>>>>>>> news:7943568.0405200932.175ac06b@posting.google.com,   
   > >>>>>>>>  he or she gave us all a good laugh   
   > >>>>>>>> with the following...   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>> "Light Templar"  wrote in message   
   > >>>>>>>>> news:...   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>> While Attila was contemplating his or her navel in   
   > >>>>>>>>>> news:qf4oa0teh61q6fm2t8imvvoastafc38ufr@4ax.com,   
   > >>>>>>>>>>  he or she gave us all a good laugh with   
   > >>>>>>>>>> the following...   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> On 19 May 2004 18:55:48 -0700, rbwinn47@mybluelight.com   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> (Robert B. Winn) in alt.abortion with message-id   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> <7943568.0405191755.24a2f0fc@posting.google.com> wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> What is it that you think I should be trying to prove to   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> myself?   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>> The truth of your beliefs.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> Well, I just find out what Jesus Christ taught with regard   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> to any particular thing, and it is proven.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> Robert B. Winn   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> How do you know?   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>> What he means is that he accepts dogma as fact and can't   
   > >>>>>>>>>> figure out for the life of  him why other people don't.   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>> If Jesus Christ said it, then it is true.   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> Prove it.   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>  You were the one who was   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>> trying to prove Jesus Christ wrong.   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> Nope, I'm trying to get you to prove the assertions you make.   
   > >>>>>>>> If you can't prove them, then they have no credibility by   
   > >>>>>>>> default.   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> Well, that is a problem when talking to pro-abortion police   
   > >>>>>>> state advocates.  For instance, I could say,  The Bible says   
   > >>>>>>> that the sun shines during the day.   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> And you can't figure out how to prove that the sun shines during   
   > >>>>>> the day? If you can't, that's pitiful.   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> The atheist would be compelled to try to prove that wrong   
   > >>>>>>> because it is in the Bible,   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> So you think that rabbits do chew their cud then?   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> just as they try to prove Hezekiah's tunnel does not   
   > >>>>>>> exist because its construction is described in the Bible.  So it   
   > >>>>>>> seems that the burden of proof is on the atheists.   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> Nope, you made the assertion that it's Hezekiah's tunnel, and   
   > >>>>>> you've offered nothing but dogma as your argument.    Note that I   
   > >>>>>> have never asserted that it isn't Hezekiah's, so I have yet to   
   > >>>>>> have make any assertion that I need to prove.   I have offered   
   > >>>>>> evidence that doesn't support your assertion that it is   
   > >>>>>> Hezekiah's tunnel, but I've never said it wasn't Hezekiah's   
   > >>>>>> tunnel.   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> Your assertion, your burden of proof.   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> I think we should wait for the resurrection and ask Hezekiah.   
   > >>>>> Robert B. Winn   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> Way to go Templar! Robert's been flattened again!   
   > >>>> (not that it's hard to do, just funny...)   
   > >>>>   
   > >>> Well, it seems to me that Hezekiah should be able to satisfy your   
   > >>> minds about this.  I don't think anyone else will.   
   > >>   
   > >> I don't talk to dead people, and as long as you are making the   
   > >> assertions, then you will be the one held accountable for the proof.   
   > >   
   > > Well, therein seems to lie your problem.   
   >   
   > I have no problem, you have no credibility.   
   >   
   > > It seems like a strange   
   > > prejudice if you will not converse with a person just because that   
   > > person has died and been resurrected.   
   >   
   > Prove that he has been resurrected.   Use physical evidence.   
      
   Not to mention, if he was resurrected, then we should be able to physically   
   converse with him.  Where is he?  Where is his body?  This man is not to be   
   found.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)