XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion   
   From: nachobiznez@all.com   
      
   "Light Templar" wrote in message   
   news:OUNrc.18925$zO3.17846@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...   
   > While Robert B. Winn was contemplating his or her navel in   
   > news:7943568.0405221127.20e9c3da@posting.google.com,   
   > he or she gave us all a good laugh with the   
   > following...   
   >   
   > > "Light Templar" wrote in message   
   > > news:...   
   > >> While Robert B. Winn was contemplating his or her navel in   
   > >> news:7943568.0405210526.2a90fa3f@posting.google.com,   
   > >> he or she gave us all a good laugh with   
   > >> the following...   
   > >>   
   > >>> "Light Templar" wrote in message   
   > >>> news:...   
   > >>>> While Robert B. Winn was contemplating his or her navel in   
   > >>>> news:7943568.0405201814.60b92dea@posting.google.com,   
   > >>>> he or she gave us all a good laugh with   
   > >>>> the following...   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>> "MrD" wrote in message   
   > >>>>> news:...   
   > >>>>>> "Robert B. Winn" wrote in message   
   > >>>>>> news:7943568.0405201307.481b1854@posting.google.com...   
   > >>>>>>> "MrD" wrote in message   
   > >> news:...   
   > >>>>>>>> "Robert B. Winn" wrote in message   
   > >>>>>>>> news:7943568.0405200528.657fe049@posting.google.com...   
   > >>>>>>>>> "Light Templar" wrote in message   
   > >> news:...   
   > >>>>>>>>>> While Robert B. Winn was contemplating his or her navel in   
   > >>>>>>>>>> news:7943568.0405191625.78628b5@posting.google.com,   
   > >>>>>>>>>> he or she gave us all a good laugh   
   > >>>>>>>>>> with   
   > >> the   
   > >>>>>>>>>> following...   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> "MrD" wrote in message   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> news:...   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> "Robert B. Winn" wrote in   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> message   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> news:7943568.0405190404.6e9401fb@posting.google.com...   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>> "MrD" wrote in message   
   > >> news:...   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Robert B. Winn" wrote in   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> message   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:7943568.0405171919.24b141b2@posting.google.com...   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "MrD" wrote in message   
   > >> news:...   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Robert B. Winn" wrote in   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:7943568.0405161416.17aa1e56@posting.google.com...   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "MrD" wrote in message   
   > >> news:...   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Robert B. Winn" wrote in   
   > >> message   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:7943568.0405151150.4bcceefa@posting.google.com...   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stoney wrote in message   
   > >> news:...   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 13 May 2004 15:51:29 -0500, "MrD"   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> ,   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> Message   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ID: wrote in   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alt.atheism;   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "stoney" wrote in message   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:5387a0lo94ns1233u3fopqukng9op6vvq9@4ax.com...   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 13 May 2004 08:03:48 -0500, "MrD"   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ,   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Message   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ID: wrote in   
   > >> alt.atheism;   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "junegill" wrote in   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:c7uo47$c4t$1@titan.btinternet.com...   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "MrD" wrote in message   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:c7uiui$svk$1@news.netins.net...   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Robert B. Winn"    
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote in   
   > >> message   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >> news:7943568.0405121714.2b50c97c@posting.google.com...   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [snip]   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, it seemed like a good dictionary the   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> day I   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> bought it   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> in   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> used   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> book store. I still like it. Do you find   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> something   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrong   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dictionary?   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You said, "As I understand it, you do not like   
   > >> dictionaries."   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yet you are only using one dictionary. I want   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> discuss   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> what   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dictionaries say as well. I think it is you   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that   
   > >> does   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> not   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> like   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dictionaries. The dictionary you are using   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has many   
   > >> skewed   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> definitions   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reflect the pro-christian bias of the editors.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It appears to go out of it's way to influence   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> word   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> use   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> rather   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reflect   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> word use as dictionaries are supposed to.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You will not want to discuss other   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dictionaries.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> You   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> are   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unable   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contemplate the fact that they don't agree   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with your   
   > >> predetermined   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conclusions.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And while he cherishes this dictionary so much   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for   
   > >> its   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> definition   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'child', he won't accept its definition of   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adultery.   
   > >>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Excellent point, June.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|