XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism
XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion
From: nachobiznez@all.com
"Robert B. Winn" wrote in message
news:7943568.0405240456.792fe378@posting.google.com...
> "Light Templar" wrote in message
news:...
> > While Robert B. Winn was contemplating his or her navel in
> > news:7943568.0405231604.5e214875@posting.google.com,
> > he or she gave us all a good laugh with the
> > following...
> >
> > > "Light Templar" wrote in message
> > > news:...
> > >> While Robert B. Winn was contemplating his or her navel in
> > >> news:7943568.0405230413.31c546e3@posting.google.com,
> > >> he or she gave us all a good laugh with
> > >> the following...
> > >>
> > >>> "Light Templar" wrote in message
> > >>> news:...
> > >>>> While Robert B. Winn was contemplating his or her navel in
> > >>>> news:7943568.0405221555.4af9f4bf@posting.google.com,
> > >>>> he or she gave us all a good laugh with
> > >>>> the following...
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> "Light Templar" wrote in message
> > >>>>> news:<_1Krc.18710$zO3.4329@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net>...
> > >>>>>> While Robert B. Winn was contemplating his or her navel in
> > >>>>>> news:7943568.0405220701.193787f3@posting.google.com,
> > >>>>>> he or she gave us all a good laugh
> > >>>>>> with the following...
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> "Light Templar" wrote in message
> > >>>>>>> news:...
> > >>>>>>>> While Robert B. Winn was contemplating his or her navel in
> > >>>>>>>> news:7943568.0405211625.4153d82c@posting.google.com,
> > >>>>>>>> he or she gave us all a good laugh
> > >>>>>>>> with the following...
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> --sexkitten-- wrote in
> > >>>>>>>>> message news:<2h517rF947p7U1@uni-berlin.de>...
> > >>>>>>>>>> Light Templar wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>> While Robert B. Winn was contemplating his or her navel in
> > >>>>>>>>>>> news:7943568.0405201626.5307b424@posting.google.com,
> > >>>>>>>>>>> he or she gave us all a good
> > >>>>>>>>>>> laugh with the following...
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> "Light Templar" wrote in message
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
news:...
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> While Attila was contemplating his or her navel in
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> news:kfgla0ld5l92q7qimk1n2opb48rhk9etak@4ax.com,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> he or she gave us all a good laugh
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> with the following...
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 18 May 2004 17:04:50 -0700, rbwinn47@mybluelight.com
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Robert B. Winn) in alt.abortion with message-id
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <7943568.0405181604.64ae2331@posting.google.com> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What you would or wouldn't think has no bearing on the
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> truth, however.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You are an intellectually dishonest person. You wanted
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> me to discuss it, but you do not discuss it in turn.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess you aren't permitted to discuss the tunnel you
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> consider Hezekiah's unless to simply rule out any other
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> logical possibility with a wave of your hand. Sorry,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> truth doesn't work that way, Winn. Thank you for your
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> opinion, but it appears baseless.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, the atheistic claims that there is something wrong
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with the date the tunnel was dug are baseless. The most
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> idiotic thing is the idea that the writing on the wall
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the tunnel was written by someone other than the
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> people who dug it. Robert B. winn
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why? Is there some law that says only people who cut a
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> tunnel can write on the walls?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I was in a public restroom the other day and there was
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> some writting on the walls. I don't think "For a good
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> time call Sally." built the bathroom though.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Well, the workers did not write any pornography.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Once again you missed the point. Are you really this
> > >>>>>>>>>>> stupid or are you being purposefully obtuse?
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> He's being purposefully obtuse. So he won't have to admit
> > >>>>>>>>>> he's wrong.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Let me know if you need me to tell you what "obtuse" means.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> There has never been any doubt that the workers wrote the
> > >>>>>>>>> inscription.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Really? You have compelling proof of that then? Why are you
> > >>>>>>>> withholding it?
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Well, I think that the best solution to this disagreement would
> > >>>>>>> be to wait for the resurrection and ask the workers.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Prove that there will be a resurrection and I will accept your
> > >>>>>> terms.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> No one is going to force you to accept the truth.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> You don't know that truth. You have opinions.
> > >>>
> > >>> I choose to be resurrected.
> > >>
> > >> You chose to believe you are going to be resurrected, but you cannot
> > >> prove that you will be.
> > >
> > > Jesus Christ was resurrected.
> >
> > Prove it.
>
> The testimony of two witnesses is true. He appeared to many witnesses
> after his resurrection.
He 'appeared' to too many witnesses. He was actually recorded in two places
at the same time, seperated by many miles. Interesting testimony, that.
I find your belief laughable.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
