XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion   
   From: prochoice@here.now   
      
   On 24 May 2004 20:56:38 -0700, rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B.   
   Winn) in alt.abortion with message-id   
   <7943568.0405241956.4c33e368@posting.google.com> wrote:   
      
      
   >>   
   >>   
   >>  > Now   
   >> > you do not seem to want to talk about the tunnel.   
   >>   
   >> We have talked about the tunnel, extensively.  You simply cannot prove your   
   >> assertion.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> > Maybe we could   
   >> > discuss something in the New Testament.   
   >>   
   >> Why?  I has no more credibility than the old testament.   
   >   
   >Well, we can take three separate books of the Old Testament, which all   
   >tell of construction of a conduit for water, give the location of the   
   >tunnel, and describe its construction, and just by coincidence there   
   >is a tunnel right where they say it is, but you say it means nothing.   
   >I believe that you could do the same with what is said in any verse of   
   >the Bible.   
   >Robert B. Winn   
      
   There is no debate about whether or not a tunnel was mentioned.  The   
   question is whether the modern tunnel is the same one mentioned in   
   your book.  That appears to be in doubt.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)