XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion   
   From: prochoice@here.now   
      
   On 25 May 2004 06:06:34 -0700, rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B.   
   Winn) in alt.abortion with message-id   
   <7943568.0405250506.6cc7050a@posting.google.com> wrote:   
      
      
   >> >   
   >> > Well, we can take three separate books of the Old Testament, which all   
   >> > tell of construction of a conduit for water, give the location of the   
   >> > tunnel, and describe its construction, and just by coincidence there   
   >> > is a tunnel right where they say it is, but you say it means nothing.   
   >>   
   >> It lacks credibility as it is full of inaccuracies.   
   >>   
   >> > I believe that you could do the same with what is said in any verse of   
   >> > the Bible.   
   >>   
   >> The bible taken by itself has been shown to be inaccurate on many points.   
   >> Therefore, any claim the bible makes is suspect by definition.   
   >   
   >Well, what you do makes you suspect by definition.  If someone tells   
   >you the truth about something, you immediately contend against it.   
   >That puts you squarely on the side of falsehood.   
   >Robert B. Winn   
      
      
   What truth, and what is the proof that it is in fact truth?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)