XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion   
   From: prochoice@here.now   
      
   On 25 May 2004 06:48:26 -0700, rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B.   
   Winn) in alt.abortion with message-id   
   <7943568.0405250548.34620498@posting.google.com> wrote:   
      
      
   >> >>>>>>   
   >> >>>>>> You chose to believe you are going to be resurrected, but you   
   >> >>>>>> cannot prove that you will be.   
   >> >>>>>   
   >> >>>>> Jesus Christ was resurrected.   
   >> >>>>   
   >> >>>> Prove it.   
   >> >>>   
   >> >>> The testimony of two witnesses is true.  He appeared to many   
   >> >>> witnesses after his resurrection.   
   >> >>   
   >> >> Which isn't proof.   People that were following an agenda to keep   
   >> >> their religion alive said that   
   >> >> their messiah resurrected.   
   >> >>   
   >> >> Not particularly compelling since there is no extra-biblical   
   >> >> evidence of this happening.   
   >> >   
   >> > So your objection seems to be that Jesus Christ did not appear to any   
   >> > atheists after his resurrection.   
   >>   
   >> No, the fact is that of all the people who were claimed to have witnessed   
   >> the resurrection, the only place it appears is the very text that was   
   >> written to promote the religion.  No mention of it anywhere else.   
   >>   
   >> If I'm advertising a product, do I have more credibility saying my product   
   >> is great in the advertisment, or if there are other independent sources that   
   >> say my product is great as well as the advertisment?   
   >   
   >Well, once again, your objection seems to be that atheists were not included.   
   >Robert B. winn   
      
   No, the objection is that you are presenting something as fact when   
   you cannot prove it.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)