XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion   
   From: nachobiznez@all.com   
      
   "Robert B. Winn"  wrote in message   
   news:7943568.0405250506.6cc7050a@posting.google.com...   
   > "Light Templar"  wrote in message   
   news:...   
   > > While Robert B. Winn was contemplating his or her navel in   
   > > news:7943568.0405241956.4c33e368@posting.google.com,   
   > >  he or she gave us all a good laugh with the   
   > > following...   
   > >   
   > > > "Light Templar"  wrote in message   
   > > > news:<8Otsc.31684$KE6.27791@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net>...   
   > > >> While Robert B. Winn was contemplating his or her navel in   
   > > >> news:7943568.0405240438.b932405@posting.google.com,   
   > > >>  he or she gave us all a good laugh with   
   > > >> the following...   
   > > >>   
   > > >>> "MrD"  wrote in message   
   > > >>> news:...   
   > > >>>> "junegill"  wrote in message   
   > > >>>> news:c8p5dj$iqv$1@titan.btinternet.com...   
   > > >>>>> "Attila"  wrote in message   
   > > >>>>> news:teaua0l3u2fvh3jsttv54nc9f8c4msnoio@4ax.com...   
   > > >>>>>> On Sat, 22 May 2004 03:18:14 GMT, "Light Templar"   
   > > >>>>>>  in alt.abortion with message-id   
   > > >>>>>>  wrote:   
   > > >>>>>>   
   > > >>>>>>> While Attila was contemplating his or her navel in   
   > > >>>>>>> news:3vata0pd52qpka4ikk8o8ihqfgu2uh5scu@4ax.com,   
   > > >>>>>>>  he or she gave us all a good laugh with the   
   > > >>>>>>> following...   
   > > >>>>>>>   
   > > >>>>>>>> On 21 May 2004 17:25:53 -0700, rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert   
   > > >>>>>>>> B. Winn) in alt.abortion with message-id   
   > > >>>>>>>> <7943568.0405211625.4153d82c@posting.google.com> wrote:   
   > > >>>>>   
   > > >>>>> [snip]   
   > > >>>>>   
   > > >>>>>>>>> There has never been any doubt that the workers wrote the   
   > > >>>>>>>>> inscription. Robert B. Winn   
   > > >>>>>>>>   
   > > >>>>>>>> It appears everyone doubts but you.   
   > > >>>>>>>   
   > > >>>>>>> It's not even so much a matter of doubt.   Doubt would make the   
   > >  assumption   
   > > >>>>>>> that I care enough about who built the thing.   It may have been   
   > >  Hezekiah,   
   > > >>>>>>> or it may have been someone else.   Winn has this habbit of   
   > > >>>>>>> stating his opinions like they are all proven fact, when in fact   
   > > >>>>>>> they are not.   He should really get over being too lazy to   
   > > >>>>>>> research his own assertions   
   > >  enough   
   > > >>>>>>> to put forth a coherent argument once in a while.   
   > > >>>>>>   
   > > >>>>>> You are correct.  It is not a matter of doubt nearly so much as a   
   > > >>>>>> lack of evidence his position is valid.   
   > > >>>>>>   
   > > >>>>>> It takes a skilled wordsmith to try to accurately discuss   
   > > >>>>>> anything with a fanatic such as this.  As far as he is concerned   
   > > >>>>>> the only supporting evidence necessary is for him to make a   
   > > >>>>>> statement.   
   > > >>>>>   
   > > >>>>> Now listen up, you guys.  Elvis used to write love letters to me   
   > > >>>>> and once made a secret trip to England just to see me, but I   
   > > >>>>> destroyed the letters, so you'll just have to take my word for it,   
   > > >>>>> and wait for the resurrection when you ask him yourself.  ;)   
   > > >>>>   
   > > >>>> I actually have no problem believing you without evidence.   
   > > >>>>   
   > > >>>> What a knock out!   
   > > >>>   
   > > >>> You were the ones who said that Hezekiah's tunnel did not exist.   
   > > >>   
   > > >> No liar Robert, no one here said that tunnel did not exist.   Join   
   > > >> us here in   
   > > >> the real world, won't you?   
   > > >>   
   > > >>   
   > > >>  > Now   
   > > >>> you do not seem to want to talk about the tunnel.   
   > > >>   
   > > >> We have talked about the tunnel, extensively.  You simply cannot   
   > > >> prove your assertion.   
   > > >>   
   > > >>   
   > > >>> Maybe we could   
   > > >>> discuss something in the New Testament.   
   > > >>   
   > > >> Why?  I has no more credibility than the old testament.   
   > > >   
   > > > Well, we can take three separate books of the Old Testament, which all   
   > > > tell of construction of a conduit for water, give the location of the   
   > > > tunnel, and describe its construction, and just by coincidence there   
   > > > is a tunnel right where they say it is, but you say it means nothing.   
   > >   
   > > It lacks credibility as it is full of inaccuracies.   
   > >   
   > > > I believe that you could do the same with what is said in any verse of   
   > > > the Bible.   
   > >   
   > > The bible taken by itself has been shown to be inaccurate on many   
   points.   
   > > Therefore, any claim the bible makes is suspect by definition.   
   >   
   > Well, what you do makes you suspect by definition.  If someone tells   
   > you the truth about something, you immediately contend against it.   
   > That puts you squarely on the side of falsehood.   
      
   Yet you are the one that has been shown to consistently be on the side of   
   falsehood with your unending lying.   
   Why don't you apply these same standards to your statements?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)