XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion   
   From: nachobiznez@all.com   
      
   "Light Templar"  wrote in message   
   news:m5Usc.10723$be.297@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...   
   > While Robert B. Winn was contemplating his or her navel in   
   > news:7943568.0405251906.68ee2c26@posting.google.com,   
   >  he or she gave us all a good laugh with the   
   > following...   
   >   
   > > "Light Templar"  wrote in message   
   > > news:...   
   > >> While Robert B. Winn was contemplating his or her navel in   
   > >> news:7943568.0405250506.6cc7050a@posting.google.com,   
   > >>  he or she gave us all a good laugh with   
   > >> the following...   
   > >>   
   > >>> "Light Templar"  wrote in message   
   > >>> news:...   
   > >>>> While Robert B. Winn was contemplating his or her navel in   
   > >>>> news:7943568.0405241956.4c33e368@posting.google.com,   
   > >>>>  he or she gave us all a good laugh with   
   > >>>> the following...   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>> "Light Templar"  wrote in message   
   > >>>>> news:<8Otsc.31684$KE6.27791@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net>...   
   > >>>>>> While Robert B. Winn was contemplating his or her navel in   
   > >>>>>> news:7943568.0405240438.b932405@posting.google.com,   
   > >>>>>>  he or she gave us all a good laugh   
   > >>>>>> with the following...   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> "MrD"  wrote in message   
   > >>>>>>> news:...   
   > >>>>>>>> "junegill"  wrote in message   
   > >>>>>>>> news:c8p5dj$iqv$1@titan.btinternet.com...   
   > >>>>>>>>> "Attila"  wrote in message   
   > >>>>>>>>> news:teaua0l3u2fvh3jsttv54nc9f8c4msnoio@4ax.com...   
   > >>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 May 2004 03:18:14 GMT, "Light Templar"   
   > >>>>>>>>>>  in alt.abortion with message-id   
   > >>>>>>>>>>    
   > >>>>>>>>>> wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> While Attila was contemplating his or her navel in   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> news:3vata0pd52qpka4ikk8o8ihqfgu2uh5scu@4ax.com,   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>  he or she gave us all a good laugh with   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> the following...   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> On 21 May 2004 17:25:53 -0700, rbwinn47@mybluelight.com   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> (Robert B. Winn) in alt.abortion with message-id   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> <7943568.0405211625.4153d82c@posting.google.com> wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>> [snip]   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>> There has never been any doubt that the workers wrote the   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>> inscription. Robert B. Winn   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> It appears everyone doubts but you.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> It's not even so much a matter of doubt.   Doubt would make   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> the   
   > >>  assumption   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> that I care enough about who built the thing.   It may have   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> been   
   > >>  Hezekiah,   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> or it may have been someone else.   Winn has this habbit of   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> stating his opinions like they are all proven fact, when in   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> fact they are not.   He should really get over being too   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> lazy to research his own assertions   
   > >>  enough   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> to put forth a coherent argument once in a while.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>> You are correct.  It is not a matter of doubt nearly so much   
   > >>>>>>>>>> as a lack of evidence his position is valid.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>> It takes a skilled wordsmith to try to accurately discuss   
   > >>>>>>>>>> anything with a fanatic such as this.  As far as he is   
   > >>>>>>>>>> concerned the only supporting evidence necessary is for him   
   > >>>>>>>>>> to make a statement.   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>> Now listen up, you guys.  Elvis used to write love letters to   
   > >>>>>>>>> me and once made a secret trip to England just to see me, but   
   > >>>>>>>>> I destroyed the letters, so you'll just have to take my word   
   > >>>>>>>>> for it, and wait for the resurrection when you ask him   
   > >>>>>>>>> yourself.  ;)   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> I actually have no problem believing you without evidence.   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> What a knock out!   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> You were the ones who said that Hezekiah's tunnel did not exist.   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> No liar Robert, no one here said that tunnel did not exist.   
   > >>>>>> Join us here in   
   > >>>>>> the real world, won't you?   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>  > Now   
   > >>>>>>> you do not seem to want to talk about the tunnel.   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> We have talked about the tunnel, extensively.  You simply cannot   
   > >>>>>> prove your assertion.   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> Maybe we could   
   > >>>>>>> discuss something in the New Testament.   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> Why?  I has no more credibility than the old testament.   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> Well, we can take three separate books of the Old Testament, which   
   > >>>>> all tell of construction of a conduit for water, give the location   
   > >>>>> of the tunnel, and describe its construction, and just by   
   > >>>>> coincidence there is a tunnel right where they say it is, but you   
   > >>>>> say it means nothing.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> It lacks credibility as it is full of inaccuracies.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>> I believe that you could do the same with what is said in any   
   > >>>>> verse of the Bible.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> The bible taken by itself has been shown to be inaccurate on many   
   > >>>> points. Therefore, any claim the bible makes is suspect by   
   > >>>> definition.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> Well, what you do makes you suspect by definition.   
   > >>   
   > >> All sources should be suspect by definition.   
   > >>   
   > >>> If someone tells   
   > >>> you the truth about something, you immediately contend against it.   
   > >>   
   > >> When someone tells me the truth about something, so far you haven't   
   > >> done so. You have given your opinions which you believe to be truth.   
   > >>   
   > >>> That puts you squarely on the side of falsehood.   
   > >>   
   > >> Yet, you haven't been able to provide any proof for your assertions,   
   > >> nor adequately refute the evidence I have shown.   You have lied   
   > >> about me and others, you have dodged direct questions, you have   
   > >> acted in every way dishonestly.    Yet you accuse me of falsehood.   
   > >> This is a typical christian response when their back if up against   
   > >> the wall.   Dodge the issues, make personal attacks, and claim   
   > >> victory.    When that doesn't work, you kill people.   
   > >>   
   > >> Now you understand why I won't give fanatics like you my address.   
   > >   
   > > Well, pro-abortion people tend to be very paranoid.   
   >   
   > Since I am not pro-abortion, what do you expect that possibly means to me?   
   >   
   > >  I told you where   
   > > I live.  Get your handgun and come over any time.   
   >   
   > Why?   
      
   Your question provided me with some insight into Robert's reason:  He has a   
   persecution complex.   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)