XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion   
   From: prochoice@here.now   
      
   On 25 May 2004 22:32:39 -0700, rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B.   
   Winn) in alt.abortion with message-id   
   <7943568.0405252132.163962bf@posting.google.com> wrote:   
      
      
   >> >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >> >>>>>>>>>>> No one is going to force you to accept the truth.   
   >> >>>>>>>>>>   
   >> >>>>>>>>>> You don't know that truth.   You have opinions.   
   >> >>>>>>>>>   
   >> >>>>>>>>> I choose to be resurrected.   
   >> >>>>>>>>   
   >> >>>>>>>> You chose to believe you are going to be resurrected, but you   
   >> >>>>>>>> cannot prove that you will be.   
   >> >>>>>>>   
   >> >>>>>>> Jesus Christ was resurrected.   
   >> >>>>>>   
   >> >>>>>> Prove it.   
   >> >>>>>   
   >> >>>>> The testimony of two witnesses is true.  He appeared to many   
   >> >>>>> witnesses after his resurrection.   
   >> >>>>   
   >> >>>> Which isn't proof.   People that were following an agenda to keep   
   >> >>>> their religion alive said that   
   >> >>>> their messiah resurrected.   
   >> >>>>   
   >> >>>> Not particularly compelling since there is no extra-biblical   
   >> >>>> evidence of this happening.   
   >> >>>   
   >> >>> So your objection seems to be that Jesus Christ did not appear to   
   >> >>> any atheists after his resurrection.   
   >> >>   
   >> >> No, the fact is that of all the people who were claimed to have   
   >> >> witnessed the resurrection, the only place it appears is the very   
   >> >> text that was written to promote the religion.  No mention of it   
   >> >> anywhere else.   
   >> >>   
   >> >> If I'm advertising a product, do I have more credibility saying my   
   >> >> product is great in the advertisment, or if there are other   
   >> >> independent sources that say my product is great as well as the   
   >> >> advertisment?   
   >> >   
   >> > Well, once again, your objection seems to be that atheists were not   
   >> > included.   
   >>   
   >> If you believe that then you are less intelligent than I thought.   Let us   
   >> know when you come up with an ounce of credible independent evidence for   
   >> your assertions.   
   >   
   >If you want to be an unbeliever, you are free to be an unbeliever.   
   >Robert B. Winn   
      
   Evidently you cannot prove your statements.  Why am I not surprised?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)