XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion   
   From: prochoice@here.now   
      
   On 25 May 2004 17:49:48 -0700, rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B.   
   Winn) in alt.abortion with message-id   
   <7943568.0405251649.5d2c12a7@posting.google.com> wrote:   
      
      
   >> > >   
   >> > > The bible taken by itself has been shown to be inaccurate on many   
   >>  points.   
   >> > > Therefore, any claim the bible makes is suspect by definition.   
   >> >   
   >> > Well, what you do makes you suspect by definition.  If someone tells   
   >> > you the truth about something, you immediately contend against it.   
   >> > That puts you squarely on the side of falsehood.   
   >>   
   >> Yet you are the one that has been shown to consistently be on the side of   
   >> falsehood with your unending lying.   
   >> Why don't you apply these same standards to your statements?   
   >   
   >Well, let's see.  I said there was a tunnel between Gihon spring and   
   >the Pool of Siloam.   
      
   Which has nothing to do with anything being either 'good' or 'bad'.   
      
   >I quoted some versed from the Bible.   
      
   An unsupported source which for some reason you continue to use.   
      
   >I said it   
   >was not a good thing to kill little children.   
      
   Have you ever found someone who agrees it is a good thing to kill   
   children?   
      
      
   >It seems to me like I   
   >have a good standard.   
      
   Those three statements do little or nothing to indicate what kind of   
   'standard' you may or may not have.   
      
      
   >Robert b. winn   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)