XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion   
   From: prochoice@here.now   
      
   On 28 May 2004 11:44:34 -0700, rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B.   
   Winn) in alt.abortion with message-id   
   <7943568.0405281044.a79b6c2@posting.google.com> wrote:   
      
      
   >>   
   >> Winn isn't here to discuss, he's here to preach.   Probably the same   
   >> attitude that got him arrested.   
   >   
   >I was here to discuss Hezekiah's tunnel, but , Oh, no, you say that   
   >the tunnel does not exist.   
   >Robert B. Winn   
      
   From prochoice@killspam.bigfoot.com. in alt.abortion with   
   message-id  on   
   Sun, 04 Jan 2004   
      
   Here is a part of the discussion that occurred on this   
   subject some time ago. It demonstrates your inability to   
   relate anything with any degree of accuracy.   
      
   Start of paste:   
      
      
      
      
   I've been to Jerusalem, and have studied there quite   
   extensively. There are people that will take you on a guided   
   tour through anything you wish. Unfortunately, more than   
   3/4s of these tours are bogus. You see, 85% of Jerusalem has   
   been destroyed and rebuilt just since the time of Christ.   
   Various wars, sand storms, and other natural disasters and   
   processes has taken it's toll. You keep repeating this   
   stupid argument about a tunnel that modern archeologists   
   cannot agree upon. I once seen a woman that looked like she   
   was in a state of catharsis after having gone on a "Jesus   
   walked this way to the cross" tour put on by some locals.   
   Unfortunately, no one has ever documented the path Jesus   
   took because those streets, buildings, etc.. have long been   
   turned to dust. They even went so far as to show them where   
   Jesus rested, and put his hand on a building. How   
   unfortunate that they didn't check the date on the   
   cornerstone of 1845.   
      
   Originally posted by Light Templar"    
      
   End of paste   
      
   You were asked repeatedly at the time of the original   
   discussion how possible validation of one detail would   
   validate an entire book. You ignored or distorted this   
   question then and you are ignoring or distorting it now.   
      
   I used the example of Gone With The Wind in the original   
   discussion and indicated under your 'one fact validation'   
   theory the fact that Atlanta exists and that the Civil War   
   actually occurred must prove beyond question every word in   
   GWTW is true. Where you went with that was fascinating. I   
   wonder if you will simply repeat yourself this time, or be   
   wrong in some new and original way?   
      
   It would really be amazing if you were ever right about   
   anything.   
      
   I am amused by the way you are determined to ignore anything   
   I say. I must have really hit a nerve with you. You have a   
   very low tolerance for fact.    
      
   I know everyone is tired of this but I can't let the Winnut get away   
   with this piece of irrational comment without a response.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)