XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion   
   From: ladyhawk_two_nospam@hotmail.com   
      
   Robert B. Winn wrote:   
      
   > Ron Nicholson  wrote in message news:...   
   >   
   >>In article <7943568.0406141549.6f1e78fb@posting.google.com>,   
   >> rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote:   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>>Ron Nicholson  wrote in message   
   >>>news:...   
   >>>   
   >>>>In article <7943568.0406140515.3000103b@posting.google.com>,   
   >>>> rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>>I cannot find the right to kill for self-defense in the US   
   >>>>>>Constitution.   
   >>>>>>Can you help me out here?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>The preamble.  Provide for the common defense.  That would include unborn   
   >>>>>children.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect   
   >>>>Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquillity, provide for the   
   >>>>common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of   
   >>>>Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this   
   >>>>Constitution for the United States of America."   
   >>>>   
   >>>>Please explain which portion of the preamble implies that killing in   
   >>>>self-defense is acceptable.   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>In my opinion, the entire preamble.   
   >>   
   >>Wow! So the Constitution stands for whatever you want and as you see   
   >>fit. That doesn't seem very rational.   
   >   
   >   
   > What I do seems more rational than killing children.   
   > Robert B. Winn   
      
   Torturing women? How do you figure?   
      
   --   
   --sexkitten--A critic is a man who knows the way, but can't drive the car.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)