XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion   
   From: prochoice@here.now   
      
   On 18 Jun 2004 17:46:59 -0700, rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B.   
   Winn) in alt.abortion with message-id   
   <7943568.0406181646.7c766170@posting.google.com> wrote:   
      
      
   >> >   
   >> >   
   >> > Well, you seem to have forgotten the preamble.  The Constitution has a   
   >> > purpose other than to be something lawyers can poke holes in.   
   >> > Robert B. Winn   
   >>   
   >> It's something states can't poke holes in either, since it supercedes   
   >> state law. Whether you like that or not is irrelevant.   
   >   
   >How about that?  So providing for the common defense of all human   
   >beings would be Constitutional,   
      
   No, that is not what is said.  Providing for the common defense is one   
   of the reasons given for establishing  the Constitution.  That does   
   not require the common defense of all human beings.   
      
   >while killing children in compliance   
   >with a Supreme Court ruling would not be.   
      
   No SC ruling requires the killing of human beings.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)