XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion   
   From: ladyhawk_two_nospam@hotmail.com   
      
   Robert B. Winn wrote:   
      
   > --sexkitten--  wrote in message   
   news:<2jhrptF10mp77U1@uni-berlin.de>...   
   >   
   >>Robert B. Winn wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>--sexkitten--  wrote in message   
   news:<2jfkq4F10j8v7U3@uni-berlin.de>...   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>>Robert B. Winn wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>Ron Nicholson  wrote in message news:...   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>In article <7943568.0406141549.6f1e78fb@posting.google.com>,   
   >>>>>>rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>Ron Nicholson  wrote in message   
   >>>>>>>news:...   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>In article <7943568.0406140515.3000103b@posting.google.com>,   
   >>>>>>>>rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>I cannot find the right to kill for self-defense in the US   
   >>>>>>>>>>Constitution.   
   >>>>>>>>>>Can you help me out here?   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>The preamble.  Provide for the common defense.  That would include   
   unborn   
   >>>>>>>>>children.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect   
   >>>>>>>>Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquillity, provide for the   
   >>>>>>>>common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings   
   of   
   >>>>>>>>Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this   
   >>>>>>>>Constitution for the United States of America."   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>Please explain which portion of the preamble implies that killing in   
   >>>>>>>>self-defense is acceptable.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>In my opinion, the entire preamble.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>Wow! So the Constitution stands for whatever you want and as you see   
   >>>>>>fit. That doesn't seem very rational.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>What I do seems more rational than killing children.   
   >>>>>Robert B. Winn   
   >>>>   
   >>>>Torturing women? How do you figure?   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>How do you claim I am torturing women?  I weld for a living.   
   >>>Robert B. Winn   
   >>   
   >>You claimed that supporting an issue makes you a party to the resulting   
   >>actions.   
   >>You claimed that you support illegalizing abortion, which forces women   
   >>to bear children.   
   >>What happens during pregnancy to a woman, if she is unwilling, is torture.   
   >>Therefore you support torturing women, and by your own logic, are party   
   >>to torturing women.   
   >   
   >   
   > Well, what you can do here in the United States is take this complaint   
   > to a court of law and then you can attempt to prove what you say.   
   > Robert b. Winn   
      
   Your logic rarely works in courts. I'm just saying that by your own   
   rules of behavior you are a torturer of women.   
      
   --   
   --sexkitten--Puritanism: The haunting fear that someone, somewhere may   
   be happy   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)