23fdc070
XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism
XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion
From: together@wyoming.com
In article <7943568.0406230405.7bd6364d@posting.google.com>,
rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote:
> Bob's Boyfriend wrote in message
> news:...
> > In article <7943568.0406222039.771c2baa@posting.google.com>,
> > rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote:
> >
> > > --sexkitten-- wrote in message
> > > news:<2j6t9cFttssmU4@uni-berlin.de>...
> > > > Robert B. Winn wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Ron Nicholson wrote in message
> > > > > news:.
> > > > > ..
> > > > >
> > > > >>In article <7943568.0406140511.7c4652eb@posting.google.com>,
> > > > >> rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>>Ron Nicholson wrote in message
> > > > >>>news:
> > > > >>>...
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>>In article <7943568.0406131710.3015ad82@posting.google.com>,
> > > > >>>> rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote:
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>>Ron Nicholson wrote in message
> > > > >>>>>news: > > > >>>>>m>..
> > > > >>>>>.
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>In article <7943568.0406131254.1688b26b@posting.google.com>,
> > > > >>>>>> rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote:
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>The basic fact is that you keep claiming that evil is going to
> > > > >>>>>>>triumph
> > > > >>>>>>>over
> > > > >>>>>>>good.
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>It does appear that way. Abortion has been legal for 25 years and
> > > > >>>>>>abortion is said to be evil. Evil1, Good 0.
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>Well, as a United States citizen, I say that abortion has never
> > > > >>>>>been
> > > > >>>>>legal. Evil 0, good 1.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>Heard of Roe? Have you seen statutes on abortion by state?
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>Clearly, this is your phantasy and not the reality of the history
> > > > >>>>of
> > > > >>>>abortion in the US.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>A court opinion is not a law.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>A woman walks into planned parenthood today and proceeds with an
> > > > >>abortion. Your contention is that abortion is not legal. Please
> > > > >>explain
> > > > >>your position that she is now in violation of the law.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > All states had laws in effect to prohibit what you describe. A
> > > > > Supreme Court opinion does not change that.
> > > > > Robert B. Winn
> > > >
> > > > The Supreme Court's job is to interpret the constitution, so their
> > > > opinion DOES change that. And what laws do the states have to prevent
> > > > abortion?
> > >
> > > The law I was born under that prevented abortion was California Penal
> > > Code sections 274, 275, 276. That law is still in effect because the
> > > United States Supreme Court does not have original jurisdiction in
> > > capital cases. They cannot sentence people to death. It has to be
> > > done by a lower court.
> >
> > Cite the case, trial and US citizen that was sentenced to death by
> > SCOTUS.
>
> Roe v. Wade 1973. The state of Texas was given permission to execute
> Norma McCorvey's unborn child. The sentence was not carried out.
> Norma McCorvey's child was born which makes it a US citizen.
Let me assist you in the argument.
First, there was no trial. The defendant was not represented by council.
There was no jury of peers. There was no arrest. There was no crime.
You should be suspicious that I'm encouraging you on this. Consider
court decisions on self-defense. They are now orders of executions if we
follow your reasoning.
Now I really do hope that you go forward with this misconduct charge. It
would really help me in some of the policial goals I would like to see.
Now couldn't we demand the SCOTUS order of execution be carried out
today and her child be deemed a fugitive escaping justice.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
