XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion   
   From: nachobiznez@all.com   
      
   "Robert B. Winn"  wrote in message   
   news:7943568.0406250511.7eea6846@posting.google.com...   
   > --sexkitten--  wrote in message   
   news:<2k1rsvF16ngduU16@uni-berlin.de>...   
   > > Robert B. Winn wrote:   
   > >   
   > > > --sexkitten--  wrote in message   
   news:<2k0jorF161kviU1@uni-berlin.de>...   
   > > >   
   > > >>Robert B. Winn wrote:   
   > > >>   
   > > >>>--sexkitten--  wrote in message   
   news:<2jti7hF15c6rrU8@uni-berlin.de>...   
   > > >>>   
   > > >>>   
   > > >>>>Robert B. Winn wrote:   
   > > >>>>   
   > > >>>>   
   > > >>>>   
   > > >>>>>"David W. Barnes"  wrote in message   
   news:<220620042140401990%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com>...   
   > > >>>>>   
   > > >>>>>   
   > > >>>>>   
   > > >>>>>>In article <7943568.0406222030.67ef7715@posting.google.com>,   
   Robert B.   
   > > >>>>>>Winn  wrote:   
   > > >>>>>>   
   > > >>>>>>   
   > > >>>>>>   
   > > >>>>>>   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>A woman walks into planned parenthood today and proceeds   
   with an   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>abortion. Your contention is that abortion is not legal.   
   Please   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>explain your position that she is now in violation of the   
   law.   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>All states had laws in effect to prohibit what you   
   describe.  A   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Supreme Court opinion does not change that.   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Robert B. Winn   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>Actually it does since state law is secondary to federal   
   law and the   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>Constitution.   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>>The constitution is the highest law in the land, and the   
   basic   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>>framework of   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>>all laws.  A state agrees to this by the act of ratifying   
   the U.S.   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>>Constitution upon admission into the union.  This is basic   
   civics.   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>Well, you seem to have forgotten the preamble.  The   
   Constitution has a   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>purpose other than to be something lawyers can poke holes in.   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>Robert B. Winn   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>It's something states can't poke holes in either, since it   
   supercedes   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>state law. Whether you like that or not is irrelevant.   
   > > >>>>>>>>>   
   > > >>>>>>>>>   
   > > >>>>>>>>>How about that?  So providing for the common defense of all   
   human   
   > > >>>>>>>>>beings would be Constitutional,   
   > > >>>>>>>>   
   > > >>>>>>>>Which was accomplished with the creation of a military.   
   > > >>>>>>>>   
   > > >>>>>>>>while killing children in compliance   
   > > >>>>>>>>   
   > > >>>>>>>>   
   > > >>>>>>>>   
   > > >>>>>>>>>with a Supreme Court ruling would not be.   
   > > >>>>>>>>>Robert B. Winn   
   > > >>>>>>>>   
   > > >>>>>>>>When the USSC hands down such a ruling, let me know and I'll   
   answer you.   
   > > >>>>>>>>   
   > > >>>>>>>   
   > > >>>>>>>Roe v. Wade 1973   
   > > >>>>>>   
   > > >>>>>>That wasn't it.  Strange how you are indignant when your rights   
   are   
   > > >>>>>>infringed, but when others rights are infringed you don't care.   
   > > >>>>>   
   > > >>>>>   
   > > >>>>>So why were all of these 50,000,000 American children killed by   
   abortion?   
   > > >>>>>Robert B. Winn   
   > > >>>>   
   > > >>>>To avoid infringing upon the rights of pregnant women not to be   
   > > >>>>tortured. Is it OK with you to allow women to be infringed upon, as   
   long   
   > > >>>>as you and only you are granted rights?   
   > > >>>   
   > > >>>   
   > > >>>I have the same rights as the next child scheduled to be killed by   
   > > >>>abortion.   
   > > >>   
   > > >>No children are killed by abortion. Does that mean you are imaginary   
   too?   
   > > >>   
   > > >>  No person has rights in a pro-abortion police state.   
   > > >>   
   > > >>>Robert B. Winn   
   > > >>   
   > > >>Good thing we only have half of one.   
   > > >   
   > > >   
   > > > Children have the right to be called what they are.   
   > >   
   > > You're right.   
   > >   
   > > Definition   
   > > child   [Show phonetics]   
   > > noun [C] plural children   
   > > 1 a boy or girl from the time of birth until he or she is an adult, or a   
   > > son or daughter of any age:   
   > >   
   > >   
   > >   Rights cannot be   
   > > > taken away.  They exist even if they are denied.   
   > >   
   > > Does that mean women too?   
   > >   
   > > > Robert B. Winn   
   >   
   > Women too.  No woman has a right to kill a child.   
      
   The question could be put; does a child have the right to kill a woman?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)