XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism
XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion
From: ladyhawk_two_nospam@hotmail.com
Robert B. Winn wrote:
> --sexkitten-- wrote in message
news:<2k4js1F1770t5U3@uni-berlin.de>...
>
>>Robert B. Winn wrote:
>>
>>
>>>--sexkitten-- wrote in message
news:<2k1ru4F16ngduU17@uni-berlin.de>...
>>>
>>>
>>>>Robert B. Winn wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>--sexkitten-- wrote in message
news:<2k0ju5F161kviU4@uni-berlin.de>...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Robert B. Winn wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>--sexkitten-- wrote in message
news:<2jti55F15c6rrU7@uni-berlin.de>...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Robert B. Winn wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Bob's Boyfriend wrote in message
news:...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>In article <7943568.0406222039.771c2baa@posting.google.com>,
>>>>>>>>>>rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>--sexkitten-- wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>news:<2j6t9cFttssmU4@uni-berlin.de>...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Robert B. Winn wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Ron Nicholson wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>news:...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In article <7943568.0406140511.7c4652eb@posting.google.com>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Ron Nicholson wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>news:...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In article <7943568.0406131710.3015ad82@posting.google.com>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Ron Nicholson wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>news:..
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In article <7943568.0406131254.1688b26b@posting.google.com>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>The basic fact is that you keep claiming that evil is going
to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>triumph
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>over
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>good.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>It does appear that way. Abortion has been legal for 25
years and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>abortion is said to be evil. Evil1, Good 0.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Well, as a United States citizen, I say that abortion has
never been
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>legal. Evil 0, good 1.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Heard of Roe? Have you seen statutes on abortion by state?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Clearly, this is your phantasy and not the reality of the
history of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>abortion in the US.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>A court opinion is not a law.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>A woman walks into planned parenthood today and proceeds with an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>abortion. Your contention is that abortion is not legal. Please
explain
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>your position that she is now in violation of the law.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>All states had laws in effect to prohibit what you describe. A
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Supreme Court opinion does not change that.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Robert B. Winn
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>The Supreme Court's job is to interpret the constitution, so their
>>>>>>>>>>>>opinion DOES change that. And what laws do the states have to
prevent
>>>>>>>>>>>>abortion?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>The law I was born under that prevented abortion was California
Penal
>>>>>>>>>>>Code sections 274, 275, 276. That law is still in effect because
the
>>>>>>>>>>>United States Supreme Court does not have original jurisdiction in
>>>>>>>>>>>capital cases. They cannot sentence people to death. It has to be
>>>>>>>>>>>done by a lower court.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Cite the case, trial and US citizen that was sentenced to death by
>>>>>>>>>>SCOTUS.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Roe v. Wade 1973. The state of Texas was given permission to execute
>>>>>>>>>Norma McCorvey's unborn child. The sentence was not carried out.
>>>>>>>>>Norma McCorvey's child was born which makes it a US citizen.
>>>>>>>>>Robert B. Winn
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Was it killed after birth, when it BECAME a citizen?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Norma McCorvey's child was not killed. The Supreme Court gave
>>>>>>>permission for the homicide, but it did not occur.
>>>>>>>Robert B. Winn
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Wouldn't have mattered, since it wasn't a citizen at the time.
>>>>>>Try again.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Well, I would not be the one to convince. Take it up with Jesus Christ.
>>>>>Robert B. Winn
>>>>
>>>>Was Jesus Christ the one who posted the claim, or was it you?
>>>
>>>
>>>Jesus Christ was the one who said that killing children was wrong.
>>>Robert B. Winn
>>
>>Where did he say that?
>>I seem to recall him *specifically* asking that children be sent to him.
>
>
> Well, once again you have misinterpreted a scripture. He told his
> apostles not to prevent children from coming to him when they were
> attempting to keep children from him during his mortal life. That
> particular scripture has nothing to do with homicides of children.
> Robert B. winn
So where did he say killing children was wrong? Or fetuses, for that matter?
Go ahead, show me the verse that specifically mentions not getting an
abortion.
--
--sexkitten--Puritanism: The haunting fear that someone, somewhere may
be happy
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
