XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion   
   From: ladyhawk_two_nospam@hotmail.com   
      
   Robert B. Winn wrote:   
      
   > --sexkitten--  wrote in message   
   news:<2l79vjF9no19U5@uni-berlin.de>...   
   >   
   >>Robert B. Winn wrote:   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>>--sexkitten--  wrote in message   
   news:<2juk0lF15dcltU5@uni-berlin.de>...   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>>Robert B. Winn wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>lseib@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu (Lawrence Seib) wrote in message n   
   ws:<75ab6396.0406231050.7f96c945@posting.google.com>...   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote in message   
   news:<7943568.0406230409.4f4f2838@posting.google.com>...   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>"David W. Barnes"  wrote in message   
   news:<220620042140401999%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com>...   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>In article <7943568.0406222039.771c2baa@posting.google.com>, Robert B.   
   >>>>>>>>Winn  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>A court opinion is not a law.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>A woman walks into planned parenthood today and proceeds with an   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>abortion. Your contention is that abortion is not legal. Please   
   explain   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>your position that she is now in violation of the law.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>All states had laws in effect to prohibit what you describe.  A   
   >>>>>>>>>>>Supreme Court opinion does not change that.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>Robert B. Winn   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>The Supreme Court's job is to interpret the constitution, so their   
   >>>>>>>>>>opinion DOES change that. And what laws do the states have to prevent   
   >>>>>>>>>>abortion?   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>The law I was  born under that prevented abortion was California Penal   
   >>>>>>>>>Code sections 274, 275, 276.  That law is still in effect because the   
   >>>>>>>>>United States Supreme Court does not have original jurisdiction in   
   >>>>>>>>>capital cases.  They cannot sentence people to death.  It has to be   
   >>>>>>>>>done by a lower court.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>You seem to be forgetting they do have jurisdiction over constitutional   
   >>>>>>>>issues.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>Homicides of children is not a constitutional issue.   
   >>>>>>>Robert B. Winn   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>You see Robert, an unborn fetus is not a child.   
   >>>>>>You can say it is, but both I and the Supreme court   
   >>>>>>disagree.  What about all those frozen fertilized   
   >>>>>>embryos used to create babys by invetro fertilization,   
   >>>>>>I suppose you would call them children too.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>Larry   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>I would.  They were children before they were artificially put into a   
   woman.   
   >>>>>Robert B. Winn   
   >>>>   
   >>>> 	   
   >>>>Definition   
   >>>>child   [Show phonetics]   
   >>>>noun [C] plural children   
   >>>>1 a boy or girl from the time of birth until he or she is an adult, or a   
   >>>>son or daughter of any age:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>Frozen embryos are already born?   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>No, they are already embryos.   
   >>>Robert B. winn   
   >>   
   >>But they're not children till they're born.   
   >   
   >   
   > Well, you do not seem to have read the Bible.   Luke 2:5  To be taxed   
   > with Mary his espoused wife, being pregnant.   
      
      
      
   > As you will notice, Jesus Christ was a child before he was born.   
      
   I notice no such thing. I also don't get my definitions from ancient   
   works of fiction.   
      
   > Robert B. Winn   
      
      
   --   
   --sexkitten--Next time you wave, use all your fingers.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)