home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.flame.abortion      Abortion sucks... literally      4,310 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 4,022 of 4,310   
   --sexkitten-- to Robert B. Winn   
   Re: immoral Winn   
   21 Jul 04 09:10:53   
   
   XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion   
   From: ladyhawk_two_nospam@hotmail.com   
      
   Robert B. Winn wrote:   
      
   > "David W. Barnes"  wrote in message   
   news:<230620040745474906%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com>...   
   >   
   >>In article <7943568.0406230409.4f4f2838@posting.google.com>, Robert B.   
   >>Winn  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>>"David W. Barnes"  wrote in message   
   >>>news:<220620042140401999%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com>...   
   >>>   
   >>>>In article <7943568.0406222039.771c2baa@posting.google.com>, Robert B.   
   >>>>Winn  wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>A court opinion is not a law.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>A woman walks into planned parenthood today and proceeds with an   
   >>>>>>>>abortion. Your contention is that abortion is not legal. Please   
   >>>>>>>>explain   
   >>>>>>>>your position that she is now in violation of the law.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>All states had laws in effect to prohibit what you describe.  A   
   >>>>>>>Supreme Court opinion does not change that.   
   >>>>>>>Robert B. Winn   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>The Supreme Court's job is to interpret the constitution, so their   
   >>>>>>opinion DOES change that. And what laws do the states have to prevent   
   >>>>>>abortion?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>The law I was  born under that prevented abortion was California Penal   
   >>>>>Code sections 274, 275, 276.  That law is still in effect because the   
   >>>>>United States Supreme Court does not have original jurisdiction in   
   >>>>>capital cases.  They cannot sentence people to death.  It has to be   
   >>>>>done by a lower court.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>You seem to be forgetting they do have jurisdiction over constitutional   
   >>>>issues.   
   >>>   
   >>>Homicides of children is not a constitutional issue.   
   >>   
   >>A woman's privacy is.   
   >   
   >   
   > Homicides of children has nothing to do with any woman's privacy.   
   > Robert b. Winn   
      
   No, that's very true, homicides of children have nothing to do with a   
   woman's privacy. Abortion has EVERYTHING to do with a woman's privacy.   
      
   --   
   --sexkitten--Want a taste of religion? Bite a minister.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca