XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism
XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion
From: ladyhawk_two_nospam@hotmail.com
Robert B. Winn wrote:
> --sexkitten-- wrote in message
news:<2m42ktFiiun8U7@uni-berlin.de>...
>
>>Robert B. Winn wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"Light Templar" wrote in message news
...
>>>
>>>
>>>>While --sexkitten-- was contemplating his or her navel in
>>>>news:2m3071Fia5npU5@uni-berlin.de,
>>>> he or she gave us all a good laugh with
>>>>the following...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Robert B. Winn wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>--sexkitten-- wrote in message
>>>>>>news:<2m1pogFhs2aiU1@uni-berlin.de>...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Robert B. Winn wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>--sexkitten-- wrote in message
>>>>>>>>news:<2lqrooFf49ukU10@uni-berlin.de>...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Robert B. Winn wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>--sexkitten-- wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>news:<2jth00F150k14U1@uni-berlin.de>...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Robert B. Winn wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>--sexkitten-- wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>message news:<2j6t9cFttssmU4@uni-berlin.de>...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Robert B. Winn wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Ron Nicholson wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>news:...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In article <7943568.0406140511.7c4652eb@posting.google.com>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Ron Nicholson wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>news:...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In article
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><7943568.0406131710.3015ad82@posting.google.com>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Ron Nicholson wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>news:...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In article
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><7943568.0406131254.1688b26b@posting.google.com>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>The basic fact is that you keep claiming that evil is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>going to triumph
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>over
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>good.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>It does appear that way. Abortion has been legal for 25
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>years and abortion is said to be evil. Evil1, Good 0.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Well, as a United States citizen, I say that abortion
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>has never been legal. Evil 0, good 1.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Heard of Roe? Have you seen statutes on abortion by state?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Clearly, this is your phantasy and not the reality of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>history of abortion in the US.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>A court opinion is not a law.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>A woman walks into planned parenthood today and proceeds
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>with an abortion. Your contention is that abortion is not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>legal. Please explain your position that she is now in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>violation of the law.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>All states had laws in effect to prohibit what you describe.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>A
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Supreme Court opinion does not change that.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Robert B. Winn
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>The Supreme Court's job is to interpret the constitution, so
>>>>>>>>>>>>>their opinion DOES change that. And what laws do the states
>>>>>>>>>>>>>have to prevent abortion?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>The law I was born under that prevented abortion was
>>>>>>>>>>>>California Penal
>>>>>>>>>>>>Code sections 274, 275, 276. That law is still in effect
>>>>>>>>>>>>because the
>>>>>>>>>>>>United States Supreme Court does not have original
>>>>>>>>>>>>jurisdiction in
>>>>>>>>>>>>capital cases. They cannot sentence people to death. It has
>>>>>>>>>>>>to be
>>>>>>>>>>>>done by a lower court.
>>>>>>>>>>>>Robert b. winn
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>All states are subject to federal laws, and CAN be negated by
>>>>>>>>>>>the USSC if they are in conflict with federal laws (that would
>>>>>>>>>>>be the Constitution, Robert). A good example would be Furman v.
>>>>>>>>>>>Georgia, 408 U.S. 153 (1972) which struck down the death
>>>>>>>>>>>penalty nationwide- the DP laws conflicted with the
>>>>>>>>>>>constitution, and were therefore invalidated by the nine guys
>>>>>>>>>>>empowered to do so.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Sorry, the Constitution is the supreme law of the land, not nine
>>>>>>>>>>guys.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>You mean the nine guys established by the Constitution
>>>>>>>>>*specifically* to interpret the Constitution, and rule on what
>>>>>>>>>the Constitution says? Those nine guys?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>In recent years, if it did not have anything to do with
>>>>>>>>>>distributing
>>>>>>>>>>pornography or coordinating homicides of children, the nine guys
>>>>>>>>>>have
>>>>>>>>>>done almost nothing.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Somebody hasn't been paying a whole lot of attention to the news
>>>>>>>>>in "recent years".
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>The nine guys are about as meaningful as the abortions and
>>>>>>>>>>pornography
>>>>>>>>>>they generated.
>>>>>>>>>>Robert B. winn
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>There is nothing in the Constitution about anyone interpreting the
>>>>>>>>Constitution. The Constitution was intended to mean what it says.
>>>>>>>>Robert B. Winn
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Article III
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Section. 2.
>>>>>>>
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
