XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion   
   From: nachobiznez@all.com   
      
   "Robert B. Winn"  wrote in message   
   news:a17e5e0e.0408010501.28a15259@posting.google.com...   
   > --sexkitten--  wrote in message   
   news:<2mm3k9Fo65emU7@uni-berlin.de>...   
   > > Robert B. Winn wrote:   
   > >   
   > > > --sexkitten--  wrote in message   
   news:<2m7ithFjhlgdU7@uni-berlin.de>...   
   > > >   
   > > >>Robert B. Winn wrote:   
   > > >>   
   > > >>   
   > > >>>"David W. Barnes"  wrote in message   
   news:<230620040745474906%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com>...   
   > > >>>   
   > > >>>   
   > > >>>>In article <7943568.0406230409.4f4f2838@posting.google.com>, Robert   
   B.   
   > > >>>>Winn  wrote:   
   > > >>>>   
   > > >>>>   
   > > >>>>   
   > > >>>>>"David W. Barnes"  wrote in message   
   > > >>>>>news:<220620042140401999%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com>...   
   > > >>>>>   
   > > >>>>>   
   > > >>>>>>In article <7943568.0406222039.771c2baa@posting.google.com>,   
   Robert B.   
   > > >>>>>>Winn  wrote:   
   > > >>>>>>   
   > > >>>>>>   
   > > >>>>>>   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>A court opinion is not a law.   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>A woman walks into planned parenthood today and proceeds with   
   an   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>abortion. Your contention is that abortion is not legal.   
   Please   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>explain   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>your position that she is now in violation of the law.   
   > > >>>>>>>>>   
   > > >>>>>>>>>   
   > > >>>>>>>>>All states had laws in effect to prohibit what you describe.  A   
   > > >>>>>>>>>Supreme Court opinion does not change that.   
   > > >>>>>>>>>Robert B. Winn   
   > > >>>>>>>>   
   > > >>>>>>>>The Supreme Court's job is to interpret the constitution, so   
   their   
   > > >>>>>>>>opinion DOES change that. And what laws do the states have to   
   prevent   
   > > >>>>>>>>abortion?   
   > > >>>>>>>   
   > > >>>>>>>The law I was  born under that prevented abortion was California   
   Penal   
   > > >>>>>>>Code sections 274, 275, 276.  That law is still in effect because   
   the   
   > > >>>>>>>United States Supreme Court does not have original jurisdiction   
   in   
   > > >>>>>>>capital cases.  They cannot sentence people to death.  It has to   
   be   
   > > >>>>>>>done by a lower court.   
   > > >>>>>>   
   > > >>>>>>You seem to be forgetting they do have jurisdiction over   
   constitutional   
   > > >>>>>>issues.   
   > > >>>>>   
   > > >>>>>Homicides of children is not a constitutional issue.   
   > > >>>>   
   > > >>>>A woman's privacy is.   
   > > >>>   
   > > >>>   
   > > >>>Homicides of children has nothing to do with any woman's privacy.   
   > > >>>Robert b. Winn   
   > > >>   
   > > >>No, that's very true, homicides of children have nothing to do with a   
   > > >>woman's privacy. Abortion has EVERYTHING to do with a woman's privacy.   
   > > >   
   > > >   
   > > > Well, let's see how private you think abortion is when Jesus Christ   
   > > > returns to judge the earth.   
   > > > Robert B. Winn   
   > >   
   > > Sure. And at that point you will be free to enforce your definitions,   
   > > but not before.   
   >   
   > I do not enforce anything.  The problem of abortion will be solved by   
   Jesus Christ.   
      
   Yes, he'll come and end all pregnancies instantly.   
   No choice for the mother, just too bad, I'm back and you get raptured.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)