home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.flame.abortion      Abortion sucks... literally      4,310 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 4,046 of 4,310   
   --sexkitten-- to Robert B. Winn   
   Re: immoral Winn   
   02 Aug 04 17:46:05   
   
   XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion   
   From: ladyhawk_two_nospam@hotmail.com   
      
   Robert B. Winn wrote:   
      
   > --sexkitten--  wrote in message   
   news:<2mm3hhFo65emU5@uni-berlin.de>...   
   >   
   >>Robert B. Winn wrote:   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>>--sexkitten--  wrote in message   
   news:<2m7iv8FjhlgdU8@uni-berlin.de>...   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>>Robert B. Winn wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>--sexkitten--  wrote in message   
   news:<2lqrhdFf49ukU7@uni-berlin.de>...   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>Robert B. Winn wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>--sexkitten--  wrote in message   
   news:<2l79vjF9no19U5@uni-berlin.de>...   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>Robert B. Winn wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>--sexkitten--  wrote in message   
   news:<2juk0lF15dcltU5@uni-berlin.de>...   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>Robert B. Winn wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>lseib@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu (Lawrence Seib) wrote in message   
   news:<75ab6396.0406231050.7f96c945@posting.google.com>...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote in message   
   news:<7943568.0406230409.4f4f2838@posting.google.com>...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>"David W. Barnes"  wrote in message   
   news:<220620042140401999%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com>....   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>In article <7943568.0406222039.771c2baa@posting.google.com>,   
   Robert B.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Winn  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>A court opinion is not a law.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>A woman walks into planned parenthood today and proceeds   
   with an   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>abortion. Your contention is that abortion is not legal.   
   Please explain   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>your position that she is now in violation of the law.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>All states had laws in effect to prohibit what you describe.    
   A   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Supreme Court opinion does not change that.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Robert B. Winn   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>The Supreme Court's job is to interpret the constitution, so   
   their   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>opinion DOES change that. And what laws do the states have to   
   prevent   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>abortion?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>The law I was  born under that prevented abortion was   
   California Penal   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Code sections 274, 275, 276.  That law is still in effect   
   because the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>United States Supreme Court does not have original jurisdiction   
   in   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>capital cases.  They cannot sentence people to death.  It has   
   to be   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>done by a lower court.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>You seem to be forgetting they do have jurisdiction over   
   constitutional   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>issues.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>Homicides of children is not a constitutional issue.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>Robert B. Winn   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>You see Robert, an unborn fetus is not a child.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>You can say it is, but both I and the Supreme court   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>disagree.  What about all those frozen fertilized   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>embryos used to create babys by invetro fertilization,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>I suppose you would call them children too.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>Larry   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>I would.  They were children before they were artificially put into   
   a woman.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>Robert B. Winn   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>	   
   >>>>>>>>>>Definition   
   >>>>>>>>>>child   [Show phonetics]   
   >>>>>>>>>>noun [C] plural children   
   >>>>>>>>>>1 a boy or girl from the time of birth until he or she is an adult,   
   or a   
   >>>>>>>>>>son or daughter of any age:   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>Frozen embryos are already born?   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>No, they are already embryos.   
   >>>>>>>>>Robert B. winn   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>But they're not children till they're born.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>Well, you do not seem to have read the Bible.   Luke 2:5  To be taxed   
   >>>>>>>with Mary his espoused wife, being pregnant.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>As you will notice, Jesus Christ was a child before he was born.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>I notice no such thing. I also don't get my definitions from ancient   
   >>>>>>works of fiction.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>Robert B. Winn   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>You get your definitions from whatever source that will justify   
   >>>>>homicides of children.   
   >>>>>Robert B. Winn   
   >>>>   
   >>>>You get yours from whatever source will justify your sexual interest in   
   >>>>the torture and killing of pregnant women.   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>That is quite an accusation.  Perhaps you would like to take it to the   
   authorities.   
   >>>Robert b. winn   
   >>   
   >>Just as soon as you take yours there. You still have some reporting to   
   >>do on Mark and me, not to mention all the other people here you've   
   >>accused of committing crimes.   
   >   
   >   
   > I am supposed to report two pro-abortion people to a pro-abortion police   
   state.   
   > Why?   
      
   For the same reason that you reported a gas station owner, the guy   
   sleeping in his truck and the theoretical Wiccans dancing on your sidewalk.   
      
   > Robert B. winn   
      
      
   --   
   --sexkitten--Want a taste of religion? Bite a minister.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca