XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion   
   From: ladyhawk_two_nospam@hotmail.com   
      
   Robert B. Winn wrote:   
      
   > --sexkitten--  wrote in message   
   news:<2mm3k9Fo65emU7@uni-berlin.de>...   
   >   
   >>Robert B. Winn wrote:   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>>--sexkitten--  wrote in message   
   news:<2m7ithFjhlgdU7@uni-berlin.de>...   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>>Robert B. Winn wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>"David W. Barnes"  wrote in message   
   news:<230620040745474906%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com>...   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>In article <7943568.0406230409.4f4f2838@posting.google.com>, Robert B.   
   >>>>>>Winn  wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>"David W. Barnes"  wrote in message   
   >>>>>>>news:<220620042140401999%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com>...   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>In article <7943568.0406222039.771c2baa@posting.google.com>, Robert B.   
   >>>>>>>>Winn  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>A court opinion is not a law.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>A woman walks into planned parenthood today and proceeds with an   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>abortion. Your contention is that abortion is not legal. Please   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>explain   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>your position that she is now in violation of the law.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>All states had laws in effect to prohibit what you describe.  A   
   >>>>>>>>>>>Supreme Court opinion does not change that.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>Robert B. Winn   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>The Supreme Court's job is to interpret the constitution, so their   
   >>>>>>>>>>opinion DOES change that. And what laws do the states have to prevent   
   >>>>>>>>>>abortion?   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>The law I was  born under that prevented abortion was California Penal   
   >>>>>>>>>Code sections 274, 275, 276.  That law is still in effect because the   
   >>>>>>>>>United States Supreme Court does not have original jurisdiction in   
   >>>>>>>>>capital cases.  They cannot sentence people to death.  It has to be   
   >>>>>>>>>done by a lower court.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>You seem to be forgetting they do have jurisdiction over constitutional   
   >>>>>>>>issues.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>Homicides of children is not a constitutional issue.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>A woman's privacy is.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>Homicides of children has nothing to do with any woman's privacy.   
   >>>>>Robert b. Winn   
   >>>>   
   >>>>No, that's very true, homicides of children have nothing to do with a   
   >>>>woman's privacy. Abortion has EVERYTHING to do with a woman's privacy.   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>Well, let's see how private you think abortion is when Jesus Christ   
   >>>returns to judge the earth.   
   >>>Robert B. Winn   
   >>   
   >>Sure. And at that point you will be free to enforce your definitions,   
   >>but not before.   
   >   
   >   
   > I do not enforce anything.  The problem of abortion will be solved by Jesus   
   Christ.   
      
   Cool.   
   Until you can produce him, stop putting words in his mouth.   
      
   > Robert B. winn   
      
      
   --   
   --sexkitten--Want a taste of religion? Bite a minister.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)