XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion   
   From: ladyhawk_two_nospam@hotmail.com   
      
   Robert B. Winn wrote:   
      
   > --sexkitten--  wrote in message   
   news:<2mm3tpFo65emU11@uni-berlin.de>...   
   >   
   >>Robert B. Winn wrote:   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>>--sexkitten--  wrote in message   
   news:<2m42ktFiiun8U7@uni-berlin.de>...   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>>Robert B. Winn wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>"Light Templar"  wrote in message ne   
   s:...   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>While --sexkitten-- was contemplating his or her navel in   
   >>>>>>news:2m3071Fia5npU5@uni-berlin.de,   
   >>>>>> he or she gave us all a good laugh with   
   >>>>>>the following...   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>Robert B. Winn wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>--sexkitten--  wrote in message   
   >>>>>>>>news:<2m1pogFhs2aiU1@uni-berlin.de>...   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>Robert B. Winn wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>--sexkitten--  wrote in message   
   >>>>>>>>>>news:<2lqrooFf49ukU10@uni-berlin.de>...   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>Robert B. Winn wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>--sexkitten--  wrote in message   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>news:<2jth00F150k14U1@uni-berlin.de>...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>Robert B. Winn wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>--sexkitten--  wrote in   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>message news:<2j6t9cFttssmU4@uni-berlin.de>...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Robert B. Winn wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Ron Nicholson  wrote in message   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>news:...   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In article <7943568.0406140511.7c4652eb@posting.google.com>,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Ron Nicholson  wrote in message   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>news:...   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In article   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><7943568.0406131710.3015ad82@posting.google.com>,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Ron Nicholson  wrote in message   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>news:...   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In article   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><7943568.0406131254.1688b26b@posting.google.com>,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>The basic fact is that you keep claiming that evil is   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>going to triumph   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>over   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>good.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>It does appear that way. Abortion has been legal for 25   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>years and abortion is said to be evil. Evil1, Good 0.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Well, as a United States citizen, I say that abortion   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>has never been legal.  Evil 0,  good 1.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Heard of Roe? Have you seen statutes on abortion by state?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Clearly, this is your phantasy and not the reality of the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>history of abortion in the US.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>A court opinion is not a law.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>A woman walks into planned parenthood today and proceeds   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>with an abortion. Your contention is that abortion is not   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>legal. Please explain your position that she is now in   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>violation of the law.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>All states had laws in effect to prohibit what you describe.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>A   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Supreme Court opinion does not change that.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Robert B. Winn   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>The Supreme Court's job is to interpret the constitution, so   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>their opinion DOES change that. And what laws do the states   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>have to prevent abortion?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>The law I was  born under that prevented abortion was   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>California Penal   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Code sections 274, 275, 276.  That law is still in effect   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>because the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>United States Supreme Court does not have original   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>jurisdiction in   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>capital cases.  They cannot sentence people to death.  It has   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>to be   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>done by a lower court.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Robert b. winn   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>All states are subject to federal laws, and CAN be negated by   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>the USSC if they are in conflict with federal laws (that would   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>be the Constitution, Robert). A good example would be Furman v.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>Georgia, 408 U.S. 153 (1972) which struck down the death   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>penalty nationwide- the DP laws conflicted with the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>constitution, and were therefore invalidated by the nine guys   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>empowered to do so.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>Sorry, the Constitution is the supreme law of the land, not nine   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>guys.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>You mean the nine guys established by the Constitution   
   >>>>>>>>>>>*specifically* to interpret the Constitution, and rule on what   
   >>>>>>>>>>>the Constitution says? Those nine guys?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>In recent years, if it did not have anything to do with   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>distributing   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)