XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism
XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion
From: ladyhawk_two_nospam@hotmail.com
Robert B. Winn wrote:
> --sexkitten-- wrote in message
news:<2ne1r0Fvv8fvU2@uni-berlin.de>...
>
>>Robert B. Winn wrote:
>>
>>
>>>--sexkitten-- wrote in message
news:<2n8oriFu3r9rU1@uni-berlin.de>...
>>>
>>>
>>>>Robert B. Winn wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>--sexkitten-- wrote in message
news:<2l79pdF9no19U2@uni-berlin.de>...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Robert B. Winn wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>--sexkitten-- wrote in message
news:<2kd318Fslk3U18@uni-berlin.de>...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Robert B. Winn wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>--sexkitten-- wrote in message
news:<2k4ju5F1770t5U4@uni-berlin.de>...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Robert B. Winn wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>--sexkitten-- wrote in message
news:<2k1rsvF16ngduU16@uni-berlin.de>...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Robert B. Winn wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>--sexkitten-- wrote in message
news:<2k0jorF161kviU1@uni-berlin.de>...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Robert B. Winn wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>--sexkitten-- wrote in
message news:<2jti7hF15c6rrU8@uni-berlin.de>...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Robert B. Winn wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>"David W. Barnes" wrote in
message news:<220620042140401990%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com>...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In article <7943568.0406222030.67ef7715@posting.google.com>,
Robert B.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Winn wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>A woman walks into planned parenthood today and
proceeds with an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>abortion. Your contention is that abortion is not
legal. Please
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>explain your position that she is now in violation
of the law.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>All states had laws in effect to prohibit what you
describe. A
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Supreme Court opinion does not change that.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Robert B. Winn
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Actually it does since state law is secondary to
federal law and the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Constitution.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>The constitution is the highest law in the land, and
the basic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>framework of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>all laws. A state agrees to this by the act of
ratifying the U.S.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Constitution upon admission into the union. This is
basic civics.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Well, you seem to have forgotten the preamble. The
Constitution has a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>purpose other than to be something lawyers can poke
holes in.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Robert B. Winn
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>It's something states can't poke holes in either, since
it supercedes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>state law. Whether you like that or not is irrelevant.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>How about that? So providing for the common defense of
all human
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>beings would be Constitutional,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Which was accomplished with the creation of a military.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>while killing children in compliance
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>with a Supreme Court ruling would not be.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Robert B. Winn
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>When the USSC hands down such a ruling, let me know and
I'll answer you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Roe v. Wade 1973
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>That wasn't it. Strange how you are indignant when your
rights are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>infringed, but when others rights are infringed you don't
care.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>So why were all of these 50,000,000 American children killed
by abortion?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Robert B. Winn
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>To avoid infringing upon the rights of pregnant women not to be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>tortured. Is it OK with you to allow women to be infringed
upon, as long
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>as you and only you are granted rights?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I have the same rights as the next child scheduled to be killed
by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>abortion.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>No children are killed by abortion. Does that mean you are
imaginary too?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>No person has rights in a pro-abortion police state.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Robert B. Winn
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Good thing we only have half of one.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Children have the right to be called what they are.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>You're right.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Definition
>>>>>>>>>>>>child [Show phonetics]
>>>>>>>>>>>>noun [C] plural children
>>>>>>>>>>>>1 a boy or girl from the time of birth until he or she is an
adult, or a
>>>>>>>>>>>>son or daughter of any age:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Rights cannot be
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>taken away. They exist even if they are denied.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Does that mean women too?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
