XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion   
   From: ladyhawk_two_nospam@hotmail.com   
      
   Robert B. Winn wrote:   
      
   > Bob's Boyfriend  wrote in message news:<   
   ogether-1F9EED.17043301082004@nntp.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com>...   
   >   
   >>In article ,   
   >> rbwinn3@juno.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote:   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>>Bob's Boyfriend  wrote in message   
   >>>news:...   
   >>>   
   >>>>In article ,   
   >>>> rbwinn3@juno.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>Bob's Boyfriend  wrote in message   
   >>>>>news:..   
   >>>>>.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>In article ,   
   >>>>>> rbwinn3@juno.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>--sexkitten--  wrote in message   
   >>>>>>>news:<2m42nqFiiun8U9@uni-berlin.de>...   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>Robert B. Winn wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>--sexkitten--  wrote in message   
   >>>>>>>>>news:<2lqritFf49ukU8@uni-berlin.de>...   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>Robert B. Winn wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>The word "abortion" is sadly lacking. Try again.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>No, abortion is a word that describes homicides of children.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>Not according to your god.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> It is   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>not sadly lacking.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>So where does the word "abortion" appear?   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>Robert B. Winn   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>You wrote it right here in this newsgroup, for one place.   
   >>>>>>>>>Robert B. Winn   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>So where does it appear in the verse you posted?   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>It appears in the word kill.   Abortion is a way of killing unborn   
   >>>>>>>children.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>I've misplaced the post of yours that I was hoping for clarification.   
   >>>>>>In   
   >>>>>>another post, you suggested that people supported abortion for some   
   >>>>>>vicarious pleasure of killing. Could you elaborate more on thsi?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>You cannot kill other people without becoming addicted to it.  All sin   
   >>>>>is like that.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>You've lost me. You had suggested that people had some vicarious need   
   >>>>met through abortion. I aksed you to be more specific. Most of the   
   >>>>prochoice people that I know have never had an abortion or performed one.   
   >>>   
   >>>At the present time, they feel it is enough to be part of a group of   
   >>>people that is not afraid to kill children.  That fact by itself for   
   >>>most of these people makes them feel powerful at the present time.  As   
   >>>time goes on, they will feel less and less satisfied by homicides of   
   >>>children.   
   >>   
   >>Speculation without evidence amounts to projection.   
   >   
   >   
   > Well, we have 50,000,000 dead children.   
      
   Really? Where?   
      
      That seems like evidence to me.   
   > Robert B. Winn   
      
      
   --   
   --sexkitten--Want a taste of religion? Bite a minister.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)