home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.flame.abortion      Abortion sucks... literally      4,310 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 4,072 of 4,310   
   --sexkitten-- to Robert B. Winn   
   Re: immoral Winn   
   15 Aug 04 17:32:05   
   
   XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion   
   From: ladyhawk_two_nospam@hotmail.com   
      
   Robert B. Winn wrote:   
      
   > "Light Templar"  wrote in message news:   
   DJsTc.20025$nx2.17440@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net>...   
   >   
   >>While Robert B. Winn was contemplating his or her navel in   
   >>news:a17e5e0e.0408141015.132b7f21@posting.google.com,   
   >> he or she gave us all a good laugh with the following...   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>>--sexkitten--  wrote in message   
   >>>news:<2n85juFtsuf5U3@uni-berlin.de>...   
   >>>   
   >>>>Robert B. Winn wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>--sexkitten--  wrote in message   
   >>>>>news:<2mm3k9Fo65emU7@uni-berlin.de>...   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>Robert B. Winn wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>--sexkitten--  wrote in message   
   >>>>>>>news:<2m7ithFjhlgdU7@uni-berlin.de>...   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>Robert B. Winn wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>"David W. Barnes"  wrote in message   
   >>>>>>>>>news:<230620040745474906%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com>...   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>In article <7943568.0406230409.4f4f2838@posting.google.com>,   
   >>>>>>>>>>Robert B. Winn  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>"David W. Barnes"  wrote in   
   >>>>>>>>>>>message   
   >>>>>>>>>>>news:<220620042140401999%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com>...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>In article <7943568.0406222039.771c2baa@posting.google.com>,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>Robert B. Winn  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>A court opinion is not a law.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>A woman walks into planned parenthood today and proceeds   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>with an abortion. Your contention is that abortion is   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>not legal. Please explain   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>your position that she is now in violation of the law.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>All states had laws in effect to prohibit what you   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>describe.  A Supreme Court opinion does not change that.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Robert B. Winn   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>The Supreme Court's job is to interpret the constitution,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>so their opinion DOES change that. And what laws do the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>states have to prevent abortion?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>The law I was  born under that prevented abortion was   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>California Penal Code sections 274, 275, 276.  That law is   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>still in effect because the United States Supreme Court   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>does not have original jurisdiction in capital cases.  They   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>cannot sentence people to death.  It has to be done by a   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>lower court.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>You seem to be forgetting they do have jurisdiction over   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>constitutional issues.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>Homicides of children is not a constitutional issue.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>A woman's privacy is.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>Homicides of children has nothing to do with any woman's   
   >>>>>>>>>privacy.   
   >>>>>>>>>Robert b. Winn   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>No, that's very true, homicides of children have nothing to do   
   >>>>>>>>with a woman's privacy. Abortion has EVERYTHING to do with a   
   >>>>>>>>woman's privacy.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>Well, let's see how private you think abortion is when Jesus   
   >>>>>>>Christ   
   >>>>>>>returns to judge the earth.   
   >>>>>>>Robert B. Winn   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>Sure. And at that point you will be free to enforce your   
   >>>>>>definitions, but not before.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>I do not enforce anything.  The problem of abortion will be solved   
   >>>>>by Jesus Christ.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>Cool.   
   >>>>Until you can produce him, stop putting words in his mouth.   
   >>>   
   >>>I just repeat what he has said already.  Exodus 20:13 Thou shalt not   
   >>>kill.   
   >>>Robert B. Winn   
   >>   
   >>Not even in self defense?  What about in war?     If I have a gun to your   
   >>child's head, can you kill me to defend your child?  What about all the   
   >>people your diety murdered?   
   >   
   >   
   > Well, since you accused God of killing people, you would need to   
   > discuss it with him.  Your ideas do not interest me.   
   > Robert B. Winn   
      
   You've appointed yourself god's representative, so we can discuss it   
   with you.   
      
   --   
   --sexkitten--Want a taste of religion? Bite a minister.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca