XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.support.abortion   
   XPost: talk.abortion   
   From: prochoice@here.now   
      
   On Thu, 15 Sep 2005 09:06:55 -0400, "Michael"   
    in alt.abortion with   
   message-id  wrote:   
      
   >   
   >"Attila"  wrote in message   
   >news:u48hi11je6ol26mpl7rr3a6nd98p4lipo0@4ax.com...   
   >> On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 12:48:35 -0400, "Michael"   
   >>  in alt.abortion with   
   >> message-id <_8udnWfrJ-v-ybXenZ2dnUVZ_s6dnZ2d@adelphia.com> wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>Pro God, Life & Freedom   
   >>>   
   >>>What would I ask any office holder? Do you really believe in preserving,   
   >>>protecting and defending all our religious freedoms, from any enemies,   
   >>>foreign and domestic? Doesn't religious freedom includes any woman's right   
   >>>to ask her God most high, what to do, about carrying their Zygote to full   
   >>>term? Doesn't carrying to full term, involve carrying your child for up to   
   >>>18 years plus through college, & again when they come back? Should any   
   >>>office holder or anyone else, tell any woman, what her religious beliefs   
   >>>should be, or what her God should say? Could even heaven help them, when   
   >>>they try to play God, with her? Could women not learn more, from also   
   >>>asking   
   >>>the mothers that had lived this experience? Could we not incentivize more   
   >>>successful full terms? Didn't our Declaration of Independence say we were   
   >>>going to "promote the general welfare"?   
   >>   
   >> No.   
   >>   
   >>> So, shouldn't we support any   
   >>>affirmative decisions to carry to full term, by providing universal   
   >>>health,   
   >>>wellness, & nurturing support, for all our children, so that a decision   
   >>>for   
   >>>life, is never a decision for a bad life?   
   >>   
   >> No.   
   >>   
   >>>Could we not be pro God   
   >>   
   >> Prove any god exists.   
   >   
   >What would be proof to you?   
      
   The same order of proof required for any such unlikely subject.   
      
   > You could ask God any question.  The proplem   
   >with getting answers, is that you may not be ready to receive your answer   
   >yet.  A couple of my questions took about 40 years.   
      
   Was there an experimental determination made as to why the time delay?   
   Does this hold for everyone?  Exactly what are the parameters of the   
   time frame under which a reply is received and what are the   
   requirements for speeding up or slowing down a response?   
      
   There are thousands of other questions but that would be a start.  Of   
   course, the results must be verifiable by experimental repetition.   
      
   >Perhaps proof will be   
   >easier after spending some time with the FACTS...  Forgiving, Accepting,   
   >Compassion, Thankfulness and Sensing Spirit.   
      
   Prove those are actually facts.   
      
      
   >   
   >Very Respectfully,   
   >Michael   
      
   >>   
   >>>, pro   
   >>>freedom, and pro life, when we look from higher levels?   
   >>>   
   >>>Very Respectfully,   
   >>>Michael   
   >   
   >>   
   >   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)